"definitely not an animal fetish"
oh so it's all zoophiles making all the furry porn on sites like furaffinity, not furries? how strange! it would seem that furry communities have, in fact, a disproportionately large amount of zoophiles making pornography that fetishizes animals in their community. Y'all should probably do something about that! After all, it'd be kind of weird to beat it to porn featuring animals instead of porn featuring human beings if you weren't, yanno, attracted to animals.
or, y'know, it is actually an animal fetish. But I'm sure you're totally unbiased and thinking objectively, given your instance. lmfao
... yes, because the definition of pedophile is "someone who is sexually attracted to children". It doesn't matter if it's fictional or not, the definition of the word makes no distinction, so why would I?
also, hey, fun hypothetical while we're at it! would you let someone who beats it to loli, babysit your children? Because I sure as fuck wouldn't. Being fictional or not is irrelevant.