this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
537 points (100.0% liked)
People Twitter
7043 readers
2091 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It's greed. There are alternative "interlocking toy brick" manufacturers, like BlueBrixx, that are cheaper than Lego.
Those are cheaper because they're made with much higher tolerances. You can 3D print crude legos for nothing more than the cost of filament. But they're not going to be any good.
General rule of manufacturing. Every time you decrease the tolerances by an order of magnitude, you increase the cost by an order of magnitude.
Bluebrixx are great! They’re also like 40% cheaper on average than Lego.
Intrigued I bought a ~8000 pieces set from Bluebricks for 250 euro.
The quality of bricks is strictly worse than Lego - there's no "click" when you put in place. No paper instruction. Small issues with building instructions pdf (e.g. brick in a wrong place). The bricks have random indentations from the manufacturing process. Lego also has some, but much less.
The set is fun to build, some of the techniques are more inventive than Lego, some are just meh.
For that price it's a steal, but if only brick quality matters, based on The Astronomer's Observatory, Lego is better, even if whenever they push the stickers at me I just want to go to Bilund and start slapping people all around.