Health - Resources and discussion for everything health-related

3027 readers

203 users here now

Health: physical and mental, individual and public.

Discussions, issues, resources, news, everything.

See the pinned post for a long list of other communities dedicated to health or specific diagnoses. The list is continuously updated.

Nothing here shall be taken as medical or any other kind of professional advice.

Commercial advertising is considered spam and not allowed. If you're not sure, contact mods to ask beforehand.

Linked videos without original description context by OP to initiate healthy, constructive discussions will be removed.

Regular rules of lemmy.world apply. Be civil.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

159

Flavored vape bans led to increase in teen smoking (www.newsweek.com)

submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

58 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

see how incestuous this all is? We have a study of studies (NIH) referencing a study of studies (Jensen) referencing a study of studies (Chowdhury), referencing…nothing at all. It’s actually weirdly analogous to cancer itself, or maybe I’m just seeing cancer everywhere by now.

This especially is the kind of thing that make me really doubt you are “science literate.”

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Have you ever once in your life read a scientific study?

Lol didn't think so.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Can you please define the terms: p-value, confidence interval, regression (it’s okay if you’ve only done linear/exponential in college algebra, if you’ve gotten that far I can get you up to speed), and significance for me?

I think I linked around 4 or 5 scientific studies to you, and quoted sections of them extensively, so we do have some textual evidence of me reading scientific studies here. (I could also mention that I get paid about $45/week by a doctoral student to do things like teach him ANCOVA, but this is the internet and I’m a dog for all you know.)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you actually read scientific studies you'd know that most of those terms you googled are fairly irrelevant when critiquing the methods of a study or the lack of data in general. They're all ways of analyzing results and I haven't taken any issue with them.

I also think scientists nowadays have an undue fetishization of anaylsis to the detriment of basic methodology, but again, that's irrelevant to the point I'm making.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

If you actually read scientific studies you’d know that most of those terms you googled are fairly irrelevant when critiquing the methods of a study or the lack of data in general.

Yeah, significance doesn’t matter at all when we do scientific research. The mathematical techniques you use when analyzing data have nothing to do with methodology.

I’ll have to let that doctoral student I’m helping with a multiple regression study know that I’m just googling everything, lol.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't click on random youtube links.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Not even this one?