this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2025
217 points (100.0% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

1127 readers
29 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 

I thought FUD was a cryptobro term.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 55 points 2 weeks ago (45 children)

You’re a 2 day old account with the same username as HC’s admin. Your only posts/comments on your account are in defense of that instance. I hardly consider you an unbiased or trustworthy source based on my experiences with that instance.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (38 children)

I am one of the admins of HC, using this account so everyone can see what I have to say.

I am telling you that you are welcome to start any kind of community on HC (within the generic site rules) and be welcomed the same as everyone else. You can moderate it however you wish. HC (the instance) does not take political sides.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago (18 children)

Yeah.. You should take sites, though. (Take the one that cares about human rights)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

At least you're saying it outright.

I suggest that most people in this thread are ultimately upset that we don't take their side. It's a bit ironic on a federated platform.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

Lol maybe if "your" side didn't want to remove rights and freedoms, and install fascist dictators, you'd have a point

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I suggest that most people in this thread are ultimately upset that we don’t take their side.

Yep. Lemmy doesn't like to admit that they are just as hateful and anti-diversity as the very people they say they are fighting against.

Plenty of Lemmy posters openly call for death of republicans. It's sickening.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If anyone does they are the minority of the users and are quickly moderated and banned.

But as you are well aware you can just make a new account in a new instance and keep trolling right Donald J Musk?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

But as you are well aware you can just make a new account in a new instance and keep trolling right Donald J Musk?

I'm aware that lots of Lemmy posters do that. But as you well know, anyone can just make a new account on a different instance and keep trolling—while falsely accusing others of trolling and ban-evading, even using that as an excuse to ban them from your communities, then showing up here to complain about being banned for made-up reasons. Right, Satans Maggoty Cum Fart?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Exactly! People should at least have the balls to remove me for shit I say and not some made-up reason. Not only that, but UM isn't even banned from Lemmy or most of the places I post to, he's on multiple instances, and he still posts all over the fucking place last time I checked. lmao

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Are you saying those are my communities and my alts?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm saying that anyone can make a new account on Lemmy and keep trolling, and also use alt accounts to falsely accuse others of trolling and ban-evading.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Are you going to substantially change this comment after I’ve replied to it too?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

If I feel I can clarify it more in order to avoid people misunderstanding, then maybe. Hence the "edit" button built into Lemmy. If you don't feel people should be allowed to edit comments, then you should write to the developers and see if they can incorporate that change into the next build.

What edit were you unhappy that I made?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I am curious tho why you didn't take a screenshot of your communities where you banned me for the exact same made-up reason. lmao

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ban evasion is against those instance’s TOSs.

It’s out of my hands.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

But I wasn't, and still am not, evading any bans. That's my point from my original comment.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’m not the one you need to convince that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I guess I’m confused then what are you saying?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

If you don't understand in the context of this conversation, then I can't help you. Good luck!

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (34 replies)
load more comments (40 replies)