db0

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 8 points 56 minutes ago (1 children)

Fully P2P on IPFS → No global admin to ban you

How does it plan to deal with spam and csam?

[–] [email protected] 47 points 3 hours ago

It doesn't blow my mind, it infuriates me

[–] [email protected] 37 points 14 hours ago

Yep, it hit many lemmy servers as well, including mine. I had to block multiple alibaba subnet to get things back to normal. But I'm expecting the next spam wave.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 18 hours ago

I get where you're coming from, but this sort of qa should be done in coordination with the service provider to work well.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (5 children)

Unfortunately the lemmy default interface is shit at telling if your account application has been rejected. That UI is thankfully being replaced. You can try using a different UI like tesseract which should provide more accurate information on why you cannot login.

But if your application has been denied, and you didn't receive a manual confirmation from the l.w. admins that it's been now approved, it's still denied. I don't know why people suggested to try again.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 21 hours ago

Which is exactly my point.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago

The point of it being a core feature, is that people are not going to Discord for its DM capabilities.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

Woke cultural Marxism

Ah we're on that stage of open fascism, huh?

 
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

I saw Musk mentioning Ian Banks' Player of Games as an influential book for him, and I puked in my mouth a little.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago

Literally the Deep State, and the cultists are all for it.

[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Wow, those phoronix forums have really turned pure fash, haven't they?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That is excellent! I had suggested something similar for lemmy frontend devs to implement, but I love to see it natively on piefed.

 

Cross-posted from "3 years of intense learning - The Dawnmaker Post-mortem" by @[email protected] in [email protected]


I've had this game on my wishlist for a while, since I saw the demo via gamingonlinux, but I haven't found the time to buy and play it yet. Found this post-mortem insteresting.

 

I've had this game on my wishlist for a while, since I saw the demo via gamingonlinux, but I haven't found the time to buy and play it yet. Found this post-mortem insteresting.

 

Hey peeps, the well-known spam problem in lemmy DMs is getting slightly worse, and the spammer in question is evolving their tactics to evade the very rudimentary options we have built-in to lemmy itself (or should I just call it,non-existent?). To get ahead of this, we deployed a DM-scanner directly in the DB, based off of this code but adjusted so that it's more difficult to pull off shenanigans.

At the moment we're only deleting messages based on the "fediverse chick" spam. However I want to point out that if for some reason you legitimately DM someone on dbzer0 with similar terms, you DM might get deleted, so do be aware about that. Them's the breaks.

Unfortunately I can't reveal the exact code I'm using atm, as this can lead to the spammer adjusting their tactics to evade it. However I plan to adjust threativore to also be able to manage your DB anti-DM-spam filters in the future, to make it much easier to handle this, even if you don't feel confident touching your DB. Stay tuned.

I do hope we get more robust anti-spam tech in lemmy and I did open two issues about this, but it seems this is not a prio atm.

If you realize that the anti-spam ate a DM. Do let us know. If you see spam getting through, also let us know.

652
Recharging (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
 
 

[...] Why do collapses happen? Tainter argues persuasively that societies collapse when marginal returns on complexity begin to decline.

Complexity is a problem-solving tool. We can reap tremendous benefits from complexity. But complexity is also quite expensive. If you’re working as, say, a scientist, someone else is laboring to sustain your life—the food you eat, the clothes you wear, etc—while you engage in research. The more specialized we become, the more those primarily producers must produce to keep everyone else fed and clothed, the more resources we must pour into coordinating and communicating and transporting.

And sometimes, we find that additional complexity begins to generate declining marginal returns—fewer returns per unit of resources invested in complexity. We begin to invest more and more just to sustain things as they are, and when we reach that point and face some new crisis, we have no surplus left to invest in more complexity. [...]

831
Advice (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
 
view more: next ›