1182
submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Don't see you providing any sources mate

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

I don't need sources to be skeptical. you made a claim. I'm asking you to support that claim with good science.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

The sources are in the references to the papers that you're presenting. The LCA studies themselves often come with a warning that it shouldn't be combined with other LCA studies, but poore-nemecek actually took an even lazier approach were they compiled meta studies that were ignoring this guidance and didn't actually source many if any LCA studies themselves. when reading the meta studies that they gathered, you can see that all of them say that LCA guidance discourages combining studies as they have done, but they're just going to do it anyway.

it's bad science.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

feel free to read the references. you don't have to read much past the abstract of most of poore-nemecek's references to see that what I'm saying is true.

this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2025
1182 points (100.0% liked)

People Twitter

7740 readers
1062 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS