this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2025
90 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

3028 readers
1115 users here now

Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 months ago (3 children)

mothers that $5,000 “baby bonus” that Trump promised during the campaign season

5K isn't going to go far for birthing and raising a child.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

We used to have a "baby bonus" payment about 20 years ago in Australia. It made very little difference to birth rates and was derisively called the "plasma TV bonus". Turns out that even 20 years ago a small lump sum of cash wasn't enough to persuade people to sign up for a lifetime of expenses and responsibilities by having more kids. It was just a handout to middle class families that could already afford to have kids, which is why it was scrapped.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

It sounds like they're paying parents to abandon their children to research abroad.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

might cover the out-of-pocket prenatal and birth costs for some new mothers.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

It’s likely need to be much larger to actually cover those costs; A hospital birth in the US can be anywhere from $50k-$100k.

And even if it did cover that cost, it would just be a way to indirectly funnel taxpayer money directly into the healthcare industry. Sort of like how the unemployment bonus during COVID was just used to enrich landlords.