this post was submitted on 01 May 2025
1122 points (100.0% liked)

Comic Strips

16794 readers
2457 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

This standard would have probably caught on if they wouldn't have gone and made it backwards.

Objectively you are more likely to need to know the day first, then the month then the year, and when people get lazy they always just leave off the year because it is assumed, but if the year is first you have to say the whole thing or sound stupid.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 weeks ago

Yeah that's more human-readable, but not easily sortable.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Depends on the purpose. For documents (especially those on which people work collaboratively over long periods of time) I find YYYY-MM-DD ideal. It spares the issues around day or month first when Europeans and people from the US work together, the document are easy to sort and, if it takes more than a year to complete the project (as is often the case in research) things don't get messy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago

Run a business? Infuriate and baffle your accountants by insisting to do all business and keep all records according to a lunar calendar.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago

In daily speech you're correct, but the ISO standard isn't meant for daily speech. It's meant for timestamps and archives that can be queried in a systematic manner. In that case, the natural ordering is to narrow down the search by year-month-day.