this post was submitted on 03 May 2025
1031 points (100.0% liked)

World News

46426 readers
2352 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/29061644

We’ve done it, we got rid of another soulless right wing politician!

Peter Dutton first made his party lose this election and now also lost his own seat much like Pierre Pullover

We’ve still got a government that green-lit new coal power plants in it’s last term, screwed over the Aboriginal community with a poorly run referendum, and still doesn’t give a shit about climate change, but baby steps hey.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (6 children)

I'm not Australian and I don't know much about Australian politics.

However, I know that Australian people drive some of the biggest cars in the world. Car companies just manufacture huge SUVs and sell them to the Australian, thinking "these dumb fucks will buy them".

That's not good for the climate. That's bad for the roads. That's not even good for Australians themselves, because it's very unsafe for pedestrians. I heard that Albanese encouraged mandatory rules for better fuel efficiency. Which is a good idea. I just don't understand why the other bald guy says they are bad.

In the 1990s and 2000s, the US Auto Industry successfully fought against every attempt to impose fuel efficiency rules. After US Auto manufacturers went bankrupt in 2008, President Obama bailed them out and forced them to save some fuel. Because outside North American, no one wanted to buy american cars anymore.

During his first mandate, Trump rolled back all those Obama fuel-efficiency rules:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/15/us/politics/trump-obama-fuel-economy-standards.html

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/13/climate/cafe-emissions-rollback-oil-industry.html

Lack of strong fuel efficiency rules is the main reason why American cars are so heavy and consume so much oil compared to European cars. The bald candidate is wrong to say fuel efficiency rules are bad.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago (5 children)

I dont know the actual justification behind it but i would say:

  1. The Liberal party here love protecting business interests and giving pretrochem companies huge incentives, tax breaks, etc to take our resources and they probably get hard for how much more fuel they can sell here.
  2. Australia has inexplicably bad fuel standards, as such car manufacturers dump their shittest engines here which run on this low grade fuel and every time we talk about reforming this the manufacturors run a scare campaign about how much extra cars will cost if they have to meet these standards and the Libs have been jumping on that.

As to the big cars thing, we have typically had quite regular sized cars and our typical tradesperson vehicles (called "Ute's" here, "trucks" in the USA) were significatly smaller than their american equivilants, but local manufacturing shut down and now we buy from whats available on the market. Also the laws around taxing work vehicles is worded in such a way that bigger cars get taxed differently and incentivises people buying these cars and slowly our car sizes are increasing and more and more giant 'Yank Tanks' are appearing on our roads. And couple this with car manufacturers slowly changing the publics idea of what a 'family car' is from a large sedan to a small suv to a full blown suv or 4x4 7 person tank.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (4 children)

(called "Ute's" here, "trucks" in the USA)

Pickup trucks in the USA. "Truck" is a more generic term that covers just about everything from semi trailers (a.k.a. articulated lorry, heavy goods vehicle) to vans.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fair enough, but it also spins me out when americans call prime-mover trucks 'tractor trailers'

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are those the trucks that are only able to move 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 11 or 13 things at once? (I've never heard that term before)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, it makes logistics a nightmare doing the maths.
Its basically a class of truck that is for moving the biggest loads, like road trains (truck&+ trailers) or moving giant mining dump trucks,dozers,etc.

In one version of the transformers series optimus prime is actually a prime mover too

[–] [email protected] 1 points 17 hours ago

English is pretty bad at naming these things. In North-American English they're often called "Semi"s, which is short for either "Semi-Trailer" or "Semi-Truck". Why? Who knows, I'm guessing it's because the trailer part is only half of the whole. The front part with the engine and trailer hitch is sometimes called the Tractor Unit. But, that's confusing because "Tractor" mostly means the thing you drive around on a farm. The purpose is basically the same, and the name comes from the fact it's focused on something that pulls, but farming has such a hold of the "tractor" name that that's what people think of when they hear that.

18 wheeler makes sense for the whole unit together. It's also good because it identifies the thing that is instantly visually unique about these kinds of vehicles, all the various wheels. But, I'm sure there are many cases where it's not 18 total wheels. And, when they're used as road trains with more than one trailer, I'm sure it's much more than 18 wheels.

The Brits like "lorry", or "articulated lorry" but where does that come from? And sometimes shortened to "Artic" which makes it sound like it's really cold.

Other names include "HGV" for "Heavy Goods Vehicle", but that's confusing because it's not clear whether it's the goods that are heavy or the truck. Presumably they're also used for light but bulky goods.

Oh well, dumb language, we should start over with Spanish, I'm sure their name is better.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)