689
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If you think there's fraud, then show it. You seem to know your way around.

My point was that no one cared about where their ads showed on Twitter until Elon bought it, and then all of a sudden it was this major issue. It was performative and it was being used to try to blackmail them, that's why he said what he said.

Elon immediately fired the content moderating team. The racist hash tags showed up and then Elmo defended them and told advertisers to go fuck themselves if they disagreed. Why are you dead-set about blaming the media? Lol

It was when you thought you could piss higher

Bruh. Lol I made my point, and I still don't hear anything reasonable from you to correct that. You sure it's on me to talk that big and walk so small? What was that you said about cisgender again?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I’m astounded that someone so smart wasn’t aware of how research studies have been being abused forever:

https://theconversation.com/when-big-companies-fund-academic-research-the-truth-often-comes-last-119164

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'm quite aware of how research is conducted. I also see little reason why such a paper would be forged for a few reasons, but since you dared to make the claim, you also get to pay the burden. And hand-waving is not it.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I literally just showed you why studies shouldn’t just be trusted, and you come back with this?

It’s becoming quite evident why you won’t answer about your education level.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yes, but it's unexpected of you, doctor, to not even click on the abstracts. Nor did you realize that your piece's main topic was research that conflicted with a company's source of revenue. In what way does this finding inconvenience a company's bottom line? It's preliminary research into an area of low interest.

Tell me, doctor of what, exactly?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago
[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I mean, your reasonable takes when, mr doctor? I love how you latched onto the pissing bit instead of matching your statements and priorities to your claimed level of education. If you claim to walk, then walk. You claim to run, so let's see it.

Oh, and I still need evidence of fraud for the studies (not to be confused with how long you claim your dick to be, in case you get fixated on another stupid pissing contest to conveniently divert from the topic).

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago
[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Reasonable statements worthy of a self-described doctor when?

this post was submitted on 28 May 2025
689 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

73067 readers
2332 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS