595
Dawwww
(lemmynsfw.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2025
595 points (100.0% liked)
aww
24485 readers
10 users here now
A place with minimal rules for stuff that makes you go awww! Feel free to post pics, gifs, or videos of cats, dogs, babies, or anything cute and remember to be kind to others.
AI posts must be labeled [AI] in the title and are limited to one per week.
While posting and commenting in this community, you must abide by instance-wide rules: https://mastodon.world/about
- No racism or bigotry.
- Be civil: disagreements happen, but thatdoes not provide the right to personally insult others.
- No SPAM posting.
- No trolling of others.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
they weren't things. treating them like things is part of what made that wrong.
and treating animals like people is also wrong.
By treating animals like people, do you mean respecting them and not killing them or letting them work as senators?
IMO treating animals like things is definitely wrong, in the same way treating people like things is. Neither of them is a thing, all us animals are alive.
you shouldn't treat animals like smartphones, either. you treat different things differently.
I think recognizing what is alive and what is not is a question of basic science education. I agree animals shouldn't be treated as smartphones.
bacteria, fungus, plants, protozoa, and (arguably) viruses are all alive, too. bed bugs. rattlesnakes. being alive isn't actually that special, nor a reason, in itself, to refrain from eating or killing that thing.
I agree fully. If you were not allowed to eat other life, you would be left with licking salt. But that's not what I meant. What I meant was people use the "thing" label to make it easier to drop empathy - to do shitty things to both humans and other animals.