this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2025
155 points (100.0% liked)

/r/50501 Mirror

1037 readers
1133 users here now


Mirrored /r/50501 Popular Posts


founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
 

But transfolk are the problem, right? ๐Ÿ™„


Originally Posted By u/Ok_Presentation_940 At 2025-06-03 06:47:38 PM | Source


you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

When they refer to the Constitution they're talking about specific wording in the First Amendment: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." They claim that priests keeping crimes confessed to them private falls under "free exercise therof", since this confidentiality is part of their religion.

But historically the Supreme Court has sided against religious practices that conflict with other provisions of the Constitution or violate accepted laws. Take polygamy, for example - in Reynolds vs United States (1879) the Court ruled that laws prohibiting polygamy do not violate the First Amendment. This is why you can't just set up a religion that practices human sacrifice or makes shoplifting an act of worship.