this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2025
678 points (100.0% liked)

politics

24586 readers
2598 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Its not like there are enough people in the country illegally to fill the concentration camps the budget bill is going to pay for

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Too late, the opposition (my fellow Democrats) made sure most of us aren’t armed.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

No they didn't you idiot.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Lives in a nation with more gun deaths than a major conflict every year.

"We need more guns!"

If guns stopped fascism we should be the least fascist nation ever. Since we are the most fascist nation it is more likely guns are part of the problem, not the solution.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I have read the premise phrased as follows:

"No amount of meaningful change will occur until the wealthy fear for their lives."

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

There will be no peace until the wealthy cease to be wealthy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Counterpoint: They most definitely are the solution.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Most countries give up when they are only one gun away from total peace.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Counter-counter point: It takes fascism to defeat fascism therefore we should embrace gun culture and become fascist. The only way to stop a good fascist is to become a bad one /S

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

With resistance like this, your country is so boned.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Please, you have no clue what history has shown us. We are the worst, most violent civilization the world has ever seen. We lose more Americans every year to gun violence than most countries lose in a major conflict. That is our fucking baseline.

You better wise up quick.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You’re an adolescent nation acting out belligerently because of a massive inferiority complex. Don’t flatter yourself.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

It is way way worse than that. That was cute though.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 days ago (2 children)

"Most of us aren't armed"? Homie US citizens own 120 guns per 100 people. The fucking answer to absolutely every problem here, left or right, has been to arm themselves. We have literally never had more left-wing people carrying pistols.

Like Jesus Christ, someone got shot and killed at the 'No Kings' rally in Idaho, and all three parties involved were left-wing. I am not sure what planet you're on, but it ain't Earth.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Yes, but averaging is the wrong take here. I believe the actual amount of gun owners is under 40%, if I remember the studies. I personally witnessed a messy divorce, and the individual that had a personal stake in the gun collection moved somewhere in the realm of 200 rifles out of the house. I thought I knew gun nuts* before that, and it blew my mind. Those sort of folks are going to massively skew the guns per capita.

*I had seen collections of 50+, but they were rare and rich... most 'nuts' that I knew just liked their personal amount of 5-10 that they thought were the bee's knees.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I mean....when we say guns, are we saying they own 120 AR-15s? Or are we realistically saying that certain gun owners like collecting even rather useless guns? Like most gun owner wishlist are having an AR, AK, 1911, Glock, a revolver of some kind, SKS, Mosin, PS-90, etc. Once you got one gun, it's like "yeah I mean I can have fun with just one gun, but it's funner to larp as a Soviet soldier with an AK, and also 1911s are objectively beautiful guns, and also yeah 1911 is a pistol, but a Beretta 92 FS would be cool because it looks cool and is in a bunch of movies, and you know, even though I have 2 pistols, a Glock would be nice because it's practical and utilitarian and those other 2 pistols are just for fun, and also i can makr glock perfection memes, and now i want a civilian version of an MP5 because that shit looks sick in the movies I see it in, and also I'm a fan of Stargate, so fuck it I'm going to get a civilian version of a p90 too, and also you know what else would be cool? A revolver, maybe two of them, one for my detective larp and one for my cowboy larp. And shit, I'm interested in a shot gun too, for self defense of course, so let's get a Mossberg! But damn the KSG bull pup shotgun looks so sci fi and cool, so I'm gonna get that too, and also wow some double barrel wooden stock shotguns look beautiful! I want two, one that I can afford to rough it up a bit with for hunting, and one really beautiful one, because why not!"

Like a few of the guns above are practical for combat and or revolution or what not because of their ease of fixing, customizability, etc. But a lot of them are redundant and bought because of some cursory historical interest/larp/coolness and alot are just for fun.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

The neoliberal controlled opposition is disarmed, because you don’t need personal arms when you have cops and your goal is preserving the power of the state and the capitalist boot.

The actual opposition (who have been disenfranchised by your fellow Democrats), were never so naive and are armed just fine. Just disorganized and excluded from the political machinery.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Sounds like a personal problem.