this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2025
111 points (100.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

35688 readers
933 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (6 children)

I was today years old when I learned that many people don't have an inner monologue. The human body is so fascinating.

Oddly enough, if I don't take my ADHD meds, I tend to talk to myself out loud a lot because my inner monologue gets kind of "muffled" in the "noise" and I rely on it very heavily to think through.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

when I learned

You didn't learn anything...

You saw a random social media post and instantly believed what it said

What the fuck is wrong with people?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe other people have read this research before as I have

Maybe that's what's wrong with them

[–] [email protected] 6 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Feel free to post that research at some point.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

All 50+ years of it?

Google is also an option

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

You made the claim, the burden of proof is on you. That's how this works.

You can't say there's science to back up your claims, then not use science (burden of proof) to back up your claims.

If I claimed there was a pink polka dot elephant in the trunk of my car, that can teleport to other dimensions with its trunk; I would be required to post proof of that. If I told people to Google it, because there's science out there that backs up my assertion, they'd tell me to get bent.

Don't be lazy and fall into that pit trap. Post a proof, any proof, to back up your assertions, or every single person in this thread is free to ignore you and assume you're making this up.

Edit: Looks like someone did your job for you, and is suggesting that your claims are incorrect and takes the wrong conclusions from the study.

This is why it's important for you to cite your sources when you make a claim. Typically people refusing to cite their sources or saying "just google it" are often wrong about the conclusions they draw from whatever research was done. This is why peer review is important, even though none of us are in that field, it's important to be able to have your claims withstand peers criticizing it. If it can't stand up to that, then it's likely incorrect and we can put that in the "failed hypothesis" bin.

Which is where your hypothesis would go.

And that's science. Kinda.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 hours ago

Just, like, one of it. The issue isn't that its been studied, as you seem to think. The issue is that you made a claim and are now vaguely gesturing at literature to back it up :)

load more comments (4 replies)