this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2025
67 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

2796 readers
122 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.

Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.

Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
67
Synology is selling outdated "proprietary" NAS SSDs at unrealistically high prices (www.techspot.com)
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
13 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I like how they think going proprietary is going to make customers want to buy their products. Fun fact: I'm now never going to buy a Synology product because it now won't work with anything else

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It will increase the revenue of their business products.
Consider this from a business point of view. New purchases will likely have a support clause that says they will only give support if their verified drives are installed. When someone makes a support request and another vendors drive is there, they can close the support case until you buy their drives and reproduce the problem.

This is very common in enterprise equipment. Not using a Cisco SFP and your Cisco switch isn't booting? No support is given until the SFP is removed or replaced with a Cisco branded unit at an outrageous markup.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I would not buy synology at an enterprise level. I would use a NetApp.

Also we use non-Cisco optics all the time, but keep just a few (genuine Cisco) around. So we’ll buy a pile of fluxlight optics and one Cisco for a set of switches. Load it with the cheap ones, but you can troubleshoot with the overly expensive Cisco sfp if needed.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

WD and synology have shit software. I only want the storage, fuck off with everything else