this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
1198 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

5073 readers
399 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I mean, I get it. Anarchy looks so great sometimes. But I like roads and schools and hospitals and firemen; and we need to.elect someone who ensure those persist.

And then it's down to choosing the least-worst bunch to do that. And that's how it's been for decades.

So, ask yourself: is changing out this regime and losing a bit of healthcare and a bit of infrastructure and a bit of other things that make life livable here, is that a reasonable exchange?

If you say yes, I respect you. If you say no, I respect you. But we can't vote single-issue: we have a choice between leadership packages, and we need to evaluate them as a whole. The yanks lost their election by voting single-issue, and ended up allowing the worst choice ever to win.

So vote carefully.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago

I don't think you know what anarchism means.

Also, governments can build infrastructure without supporting foreign genocide.

The Original Commenter (OC) of this thread isn't saying they want to abolish government entirely. They are saying that government has been twisted and no longer represents the wishes of its people.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

'I'll vote for people who support genocide if they will pass a little bit less publicly owned infrastructure into the hands of private capital' is a pathetic position to take.

It absolutely is not worthy of respect.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Your take is so weak. The "yanks" lost the election because of disinformation campaigns and low information voters. By placating fascist political action, all you are is delaying the inevitable decline of civilization. You're a frog sitting in a warming pot complimenting the relaxing pond.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

The Democrats lost because they fucked up and lost sight of the average person as they disappeared up their own arses.

If the Dems don't take accountability for their own failings it will continue to happen

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I don't know maybe it is better. Yes many will die horribly but already is, just in another part of the world because of governments that are being used as tongs by billionaires