this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2025
958 points (100.0% liked)

Comic Strips

18069 readers
1920 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 124 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

But why is it human nature to put a bench right where people are walking. It's like people in charge get off on creating obstacles for the common man just to feel powerful.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Over time, it will destroy large parts of the park.

[–] [email protected] 113 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Well, don't design park the brain-dead way and try to actually think about visitors and their needs. As in make a straight route to a damn crosswalk instead of making it an obstacle course.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

What? No! You should be happy to even get any green to begin with.

- Capitalism

[–] [email protected] 38 points 4 days ago (2 children)

A field of monoculture grass is already destroyed.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Ackchyually, grass is almost always a mixture of different species (ryegrass, fescue and bluegrass) and therefore not a monoculture.

A lawn has its uses in parks, for example to have a Picknick. If you trow in some clover, daisies and ribwort, don't spray and patches are left to grow to provide shelter it's not that bad for biodiversity, depending on the climate of course.

Example of patch of long grass

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago

Yeah, there's grass and then there's grass. Sure. I got no beef with a field of mixed grass that's left to grow, especially if there's mixed native wildflowers etc.

It's the fields of monoculture non-native grass that the Suburban White Dude[tm] wants to obsessively cultivate and that seems to be the goal of parks departments everywhere that's the problem.

My partner ranted to me the other day that she couldn't get a 10m^2 area from a local municipal parks department recently for a Miyawaki forest plot. No reasons, just "no." Very frustrating group of fuckin' boomers.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

The park that people are supposed to walk through?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (4 children)

People weren't supposed to create that shortcut in the first place, thus disrespecting the park.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 4 days ago

The park design should have accounted for the crosswalk on the top intersection from the get go or, alternatively, once the people made their desire for a path there obvious. The park isn't some sentient thing with its own opinion, it got made by people with 2 main functions: enhancing the environment and serving as a foot path. It is obviously failing at the second until the designers finally relented and put a proper path down to the crosswalk.

Note: you will always get people not using the path but when it's enough people to form a permanent trail then the park design obviously did not account for a rather popular destination and should be revised.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 4 days ago

Green spaces: Just for viewing.

What kind of dystopian hellscape do you want the world to be, exactly?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 days ago

weren't supposed to

As if walking on grass in an emtpy park is comparable to driving a red light on a busy street.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

This has to be a joke right? Are you actually mad about desire paths?