this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2025
591 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

15726 readers
2370 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 75 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Well… it’s not capable of being moral. It answers part 1 and then part 2, like a machine

[–] [email protected] 47 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Yeah these “stories” reek of blaming a failing -bordering on non-existent (in some areas)- mental health care apparatus on machines that predict text. You could get the desired results just googling “tallest bridges in x area”. That isn’t a story that generates clicks though.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 days ago

The issue is that there is a push to make these machines act as social partners and in some extremely misguided scenarios therapists

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Being 'moral', means to have empathy. But empathy is only possible between two beings that share experiences and reality or at least some aspects of it. LLMs don't have experiences, but it builds it's weights from training data. It is fundamentally a computer program. Just textual information is not enough to build deep context. For example, when I say "this apple is red", anyone reading this can easily visualize a red apple because of your experience seeing a apple. That cannot be put into text because it is a fundamental part of human experience that is not available to a computer program, as of yet.

At least that is my hypothesis. I can very obviously be wrong., which is another fundamentally human experience.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

This reply is more of a light hearted nitpick and not replying to the substance of your comment but...

For example, when I say "this apple is red", anyone reading this can easily visualize a red apple because of your experience seeing a apple.

To be fair you said anyone, not everyone, but as someone with aphantasia I can't relate to this. I can't visualize an apple.