this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
407 points (100.0% liked)

politics

24708 readers
2693 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Paywall removed https://archive.is/UnSQN

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 128 points 20 hours ago (43 children)

People always say the Democrats are out of touch. While that is certainly true, that's not the real issue here. The Democrats know perfectly well what they would have to do to defeat Trump. It's blindingly obvious, after all. The point is they don't want to do any of those things.

[–] [email protected] 67 points 17 hours ago (26 children)

It's partly that, but it's also that doing what Democrats want never seems to get the turnout that it should.

Biden did student loan forgiveness, which should have given him all the college votes, yet people shurg and go "Well yea! About time!"

He puts money into infrastructures and unions and again, people go "I guess, it's a bit better than Republicans!"

Democratic voters suck ass at rallying behind any cause, because the base is filled with "well actually...!" people, that demand 100% problem completion on day one, otherwise they are not impressed.

And even if he solved every problem ever, they'd say, "Well yea, he should fix them... He caused most of them!"

Meanwhile, Republican voters will literarily vote for a rapist because they see the bigger picture. For as stupid as they are, they understand you have to be IN POWER to do anything.

Twirling your thumb in your asshole pining about raising taxes and fist past the post and equality for all and protecting minorities is a colossal waste of time if you don't VOTE.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (3 children)

Eh. I get what you’re saying, but so much of the disillusionment from the potential dem base is coming from their constant promises and constantly arriving at the obvious conclusion decades late and then acting like they’re the most progressive politician in human history. While in reality it’s a half step toward the policies we should’ve enacted forty years ago.

It’s not that people are like “so what.” It’s the deep seeded knowledge in all of us that the party will try to throw us crumbs and claim like they’ve always been on our side and are the most righteous policy makers that are saving us, when in reality they’re walking hand in hand with people that are pushing us to absolute limit of barely acceptable and then dangling what they’ve known they should’ve done forever ago in front of us when we’re finally at our breaking point.

They don’t care about us. They’re not beholden to us, and it shows. They’re beholden to money and are performatively throwing us scraps when they have an opponent so far right that it’s literally the threat of fascism. And they are very much responsible for the continued rightward march of the entire country.

[–] lmmarsano 1 points 2 hours ago

It’s the deep seeded knowledge

Deep-seated.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

You're just proving what the guy you responded to said.

Under democrats we got gay marriage, the repeal of don't ask don't tell, the affordable care act, net neutrality, other stuff I can't think of at the moment, and instead of accepting slow progress the response is "you should have done that 40 years ago, I'm going to stay home because you're not moving fast enough for me."

On the other hand, republicans kept voting every fucking chance they had and after 50 years they got Roe overturned because those scraps add up eventually.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

No gay marriage was the courts, and now may end up being removed like Roe v Wade.

On the other hand, republicans kept voting every fucking chance they had and after 50 years they got Roe overturned because those scraps add up eventually.

By actually doing a long term plan and doing absolutely anything needed to get it done.

With dems we get half solutions, like ACA.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

No gay marriage was the courts, and now may end up being removed like Roe v Wade.

And who was it that appointed those judges?

So steps towards a goal from republicans are part of a long term plan to what they need, but from Democrats they're half assed? Come on man. We were never going to get socialized medicine in one step.

The point here is that under Democrats there is progress. Would it be nice if it happened faster? Hell yes. But right now we're racing backwards, and that sure as hell isn't going to get us anywhere good unless you're an accelerationist.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago

And who was it that appointed those judges?

GOP after dems thought they'd play nice or by the rules.

No the point is the dems refuse to long term plan or plan at all for when in power. That's the issue.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 14 hours ago

Republican voters say the exact same things about Republican politicians.

They constantly talk about how conservative shitbags that waffled on this one thing are RINOs.

They make up conspiracies where Democrats are stopping their preferred solution even when Republicans control every branch of government.

They just have the votes.

It's not understanding, it's blind faith.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

when in reality they’re walking hand in hand with people that are pushing us to absolute limit of barely acceptable and then dangling what they’ve known they should’ve done forever ago in front of us when we’re finally at our breaking point.

Please, talk to some ordinary Americans sometime. Some of the real, salt-of-the-earth types who regularly and reliably vote, and who make up the majority of the country.

You know, morons.

"The Dems aren't going left enough fast enough!" is not generally the refrain, even from those who do vote Dem.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Of course not, that's some commie shit.

The refrain is more like, "the dems don't actually want to help us, they're just distracting us with performative outrage"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

And when you ask them what performative outrage that is, their answer is generally less "They made minor economic concessions to the working class!" and more "They acknowledged that BROWN people and TRANS people have RIGHTS"

[–] [email protected] 17 points 15 hours ago

It's actually, "the economic changes they made have no impact on me and instead seem targeted at minorities"

Chalk it up to a half-century of reactionary "welfare queen" propaganda, the truth is that democrats aren't addressing the grievances of the working class and the Republicans are. Those grievances dont just go away if you stop talking about brown and trans people. Even if you're willing to throw them under the bus - those voters will just vote for the person actually running them over.

Either democrats become as fascist as the Republicans, or they break through to those reactionary voters by proving that they're willing to break some billionare kneecaps and make life better for everyone, not just the most visibly impoverished.

Democrats won't, though. They'll fight tooth and nail against the popular energy in their own base in order to keep their tenuous relationship with donors like Ackmann, and that will guarantee their loss.

load more comments (22 replies)
load more comments (38 replies)