United States | News & Politics

3140 readers

464 users here now

Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

245

Republicans block vote to release Epstein files (www.newsweek.com)

submitted 6 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

21 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The matter made its way into the political discourse as the House Rules Committee considered the issue, after a failed attempt by the Democrats to force a vote in Congress on whether the Epstein files should be made public.

As one of the oldest standing committees in Congress, the group's key role concerns the flow of legislation to the House floor.

Khanna's amendment was in effect a procedural measure that was tacked on to the GENIUS Act, which relates to digital assets such as crypto currency. If the amendment had been passed, it would have forced Attorney General Pam Bondi to publish the Epstein documents on a "publicly accessible website."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago

isn't there a legal principle, in which if evidence is destroyed, it is assumed that it was incriminating.

IE,

I have proof that I'm innocent, but ups, it got blown up, then the judge must assume that said evidence was actually incriminating.

I'm this case, them not releasing the Epstein's files, isn't just evidence that they are pedos, but proof that they are. because they can release them at any time to prove their innocence, and therefore not doing so means they are involved in a conspiracy to protect pedophiles.