this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2023
330 points (96.1% liked)
Programming
19468 readers
105 users here now
Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!
Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.
Hope you enjoy the instance!
Rules
Rules
- Follow the programming.dev instance rules
- Keep content related to programming in some way
- If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos
Wormhole
Follow the wormhole through a path of communities [email protected]
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I like 1-index because its what I learned first, and you like 0-index because that's what you learned first
We just need to compromise, arrays start at 0.5
Peak centrism
My hot take: There is no such thing as 0-index. If you start with 1 it's an index, of you start with 0 it's an offset.
TBF everyone in school learn to start counting at 1, then they unlearn that in programming. There are also some objective reasons to use 0-based indexing https://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/EWD/transcriptions/EWD08xx/EWD831.html
I learned BASIC first, so... no.
And 0-index is what's real. If you have ever touched hardware that's 1-indexed, your retro hobbies are even more esoteric than mine.
i respect that
I like 0 index because it is 2hat is used under the hood. The index is not really an index but rather an offset from the array pointer.
I learnt 0-index, still think 1 is more intuitive