this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
947 points (96.9% liked)

Mildly Interesting

19785 readers
81 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 73 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Enjoy being stuck behind the asshole in a C130 with trucknutz.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Would be super impressed if a C130 didn't end up in the cornfield on t/o

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 years ago

American problems (too short of a runway for your jumbo jet) require American solutions (rocket boosted Yeehaw 🤠)

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 years ago

God that is so fucking glorious

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Those are booster jet engines?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago

Jet Assisted Takeoff - The gif is Fat Albert which is part of the Blue Angels. There was a plan to use jet-assisted landing and takeoff to rescue hostages in Iran but it wasn't used after a failed test of the landing jets.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago

Solid rocket boosters, but they’re called “jet assisted take-off” for some reason.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

Yep, "Fat Albert" JATO (Jet Assisted Take-Off) C130.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

C130s were designed to operate from relatively short unimproved runways. If the place has enough runway to operate corporate jets, it should have enough for a C130.

EDIT: This place only has enough runway (2998 x 50 ft ) for small Cessna size aircraft, so no jets or C130s.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I reckon a C130 could use it actually. The US Navy landed one on a carrier, which is probably shorter then this runway.

Edit: yes, USS Nimitz is 1/3 the length of this runway. C130 could land and take-off there with no issues.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Muddin' on the weekends!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Thank you, this gave me a good chuckle.