this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2023
15 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

6 readers
1 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and either a link to reputable news source, or be a text post.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

We are friends with [email protected], a uk news community on a more general site.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 years ago (8 children)

Almost like the policy of "money printer go brrrrr" was a bad idea.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Typical gaslighting technic. Vague statements with nothing to back up what you actually mean or any relevance to the topic at hand. The only reason the UK has done quantitative easing is in response to the failed government policies. With this we would have seen pensions wiped out. This is the fault of government not the BOE.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Yeah, what do those Bank of England economists who have said that they printed too much money know about the economy, eh?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Some some context. You are spouting gibberish.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Not exactly a lot of context is there? First main point would be that this is ~~Murdoch~~ Comcast media who will jump through hoops to throw the blame away from Government. Always look at the bias of the reporter to understand how credible it will be.

When asked about inflation, Mr Haldane said: "It [the Bank of England] kept on printing money for a bit longer than it needed to.

Which leads to the linked article : https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-bank-of-england-unleashes-further-150bn-of-support-for-economy-12124096

You have latched onto one sentence and want to use this as the reason for inflation for the UK. It is pretty loose. I can see why your first comments were so vague.

There is no value attached to "a bit", neither is there any statistic thrown out as to how much this has affected inflation. The money printing as you like to call it was because of lock down. Which was at the behest of government. So you have taken a government policy issue and exaggerated the statement of "a bit" and decided this is the be all and end all of inflation from a statement made three years previously.

Here is someone who understands economics. . Let me highlight some comments:

Add this all together, and what King is really saying is that if you print money you get inflation[1]. Unsurprisingly, this simple notion which has long been beloved by right-wing politicians has now won support and amplification by those politicians and media friendly to their cause.

As I said always understand the bias of the media.

The writer adds:

I would not, of course, have written the paper if I thought he was. What I assemble is data that shows that although QE clearly did increase the money supply it did not in any way influence inflation upward. Indeed, there was no hint that inflation might take off until the autumn of 2021 when it was very apparent that it was other factors (Covid reopening, supply chain issues, war, sanctions, energy company profiteering, etc) that very obviously created the situation we now find ourselves in.

It then adds a lot of data to prove his point. So no, I am not stating your are wrong. A whole field of economists are saying that. They also point out the bias of your media link.

EDIT changed Murdoch to Comcast

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Your rant falls at the first hurdle, because Murdoch sold Sky News in 2018.

Ironic that you complain about media bias when you're constantly linking to LeftFootForward. Hardly an unbiased source.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

I take it from your evasion in the reply that you cannot fault the article I linked that debunks your previous opinion?

Your rant falls at the first hurdle, because Murdoch sold Sky News in 2018.

True it is now owned by fox news owner comcast. Comcast has some very close links to the GOP, which is also part of the national conservative group. It is still very right wing in bias. Being right wing bias was the pertinent point as the article stated.

Ironic that you complain about media bias when you’re constantly linking to LeftFootForward. Hardly an unbiased source.

There is not a media on earth that does not have a bias. What I said was that you should always remember where the bias is. You can hardly fault me for not posting more from right wing media when they fail with honesty and credibility. My personal bias is left of centre with a strong dislike for the current batch of Tories.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)