this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
510 points (92.2% liked)

Political Memes

8020 readers
2625 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The "two sides" argument is pretty BS.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Any other argument is just plain wrong and negates history

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'd argue that the "two sides" argument is voiced by people who either don't know the history, or is too biased to care.

There is always two sides to any conflict, by definition. It's in of itself an intellectual cop out. But, bringing that point up when one side killing 30 children for every 1 killed, suggests the real basis is one of the two mentioned in the beginning.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is always two sides to any conflict, by definition

That's a great point and it is also very important here.

Really not much more to say. Reducing this conflict to the number of people killed on each side is just unreasonable and lacks both context and nuance.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Reducing this conflict to the number of people killed on each side is just unreasonable and lacks both context and nuance

... you're the one that is reducing it to "both sides". You do see that, right? Which is the whole point?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It's not a reduction to include historical context, motivations, etc.

If you do think that you should look up what reduction means.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It really is.

It’s a cop out because you can say that about any conflict. “They hate each other, that’s just the way it is.”

It’s also a license to continue the egregious conduct, because “it can’t be solved.”