this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
987 points (100.0% liked)

People Twitter

6784 readers
462 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you like comfortable echo chambers and rigorous banning of people you don't agree with, why don't you just stay on reddit?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's not a novel or interesting idea. Having low grade shit shoveled onto the platform has no impact on "echo chambers".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why don't you make an actual argument instead of calling mine "low grade shit"?

Just because you found what I said offensive doesn't make it any less true.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why don't you make an actual argument instead of calling mine "low grade shit"?

Because your statement really is low grade shit and you're obviously not interested in an actual discussion or debate.

Just because you found what I said offensive...

Lol, you're giving yourself too much credit. I doubt anyone is offended by your shitheel low effort trolling. Don't confuse people calling out your stupidity with people being offended by your stupidity. You're not that clever.

doesn't make it any less true.

"women fought for the right to work" may be a factual statement on its own, but it's entirely irrelevant to the context of the OP.

This you?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

“I called your argument shit because it IS shit.”

Yeah, sorry, I don’t buy that. That’s like telling a battered woman you beat her because she deserved it.

You’re just excusing your own verbal abuse on the grounds that it was necessary because what I said has upset you, but you’re unable to articulate why.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why do you think you upset anyone? Your initial statement was irrelevant and ignorant, but it didn't upset me in the slightest. I CAN articulate my thoughts, but it's pointless because you're not having a discussion in good faith as demonstrated by your responses to others who DID articulate why you're talking out your ass.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why do you think you upset anyone?

Because if I didn’t, there’d be no point in so many people spending the time and effort they did to make sure I regret posting that.

Yet no one has managed to prove me wrong, at best they’ve managed to convince me it was inappropriate because the woman in the OP wasn’t blaming the patriarchy for her situation.

But I’m sure you could have articulated that if you had wanted to, you just didn’t because it’s easier to insult people you disagree with than to have an actual argument with them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People can call you a dumbass without being upset.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, by that reasoning I can also criticize women without being a troll or a misogynist.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

responds to a basic meme that happens to be a picture of a woman by making a completely irrelevant comment that specifically criticizes women.

"guys I'm totally not a troll or a misogynist".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Responds to a factual comment that happens to criticize women by making a completely irrelevant accusation of it being "nonsensical" and "low grade shit".

"guys I'm totally not upset"