this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
453 points (100.0% liked)

World News

46074 readers
2837 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

My understanding is that no one even wanted the islands until they found oil nearby.

Bingo!

there’s no reason to argue for Argentinian ownership of the Falklands. Hell, Argentina taking ownership of the Falklands is more colonialist than UK maintaining ownership

The United Nations says otherwise.

The Wiki page is really interesting reading on the ownership of that island, really jumps around over the centuries.

This one part of the article really jumps out at me...

That self-determination is further rendered inapplicable due to the disruption of the territorial integrity of Argentina that began with a forceful removal of its authorities in the islands in 1833, thus there is a failure to comply with an explicit requirement of UN Resolution 1514 (XV).[93][94]

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You literally cherry picked and misrepresented that paragraph.

The actual paragraph states the UN declared that the UK and Argentina should negotiate a peaceful resolution to the question of sovereignty over the Falklands.

Twice the Argentine government declined British offers to have the matter heard by the International Court of Justice and instead STARTED A WAR.

The population doesn't want to join Argentina and Argentina has never made any honest attempt to negotiate in good faith.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

and Argentina has never made any honest attempt to negotiate in good faith.

How do you know this? Honestly curious.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Read the fucking reply. It's right there. Twice the UK offered to have the matter heard by the International Court of Justice. Twice Argentina refused.

Their demand has been the total removal of the British population and unconditional surrender of all of the Falklands island.

That's how we know.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Read the fucking reply. It’s right there.

Any link to a source?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It is literally in the Wikipedia sources you keep using that you claim to have read.

So we will put that claim to have read the article down as another in your long line of fabrications.