this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2023
407 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

70249 readers
3347 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Apple is now banned from selling its latest Apple Watches in the US::Apple can no longer sell the Apple Watch Ultra 2 and Watch Series 9 in the US. The International Trade Commission issued an import ban on the devices that took effect on December 26th, 2023.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Really wonder what exactly Apple is planning/trying to do here. They have more than enough money to settle with Masimo - IMO it makes the most sense for them to just settle an amount for the existing watches, and redesign a new oxygen sensor module for the US market.

Kind of silly for them to expect some kind of special treatment ripping off another company's tech, when they themselves are hyper protective over copycats ripping them off

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe the sales figures were less than expected and will use this as an excuse to the board.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Well, if I was on the board or a shareholder, I would be much more pissed about patent infringment that should have been easy to prevent and hints at incompetence over lower than expected sales which is just hard to predict.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you were an invester or board member, you wouldn't care about the patent infringement - Apple has historically done this and you wouldn't invest in the first place if you weren't okay with it. This one's just getting more eyeballs and actual repurcussions but they've paid off and bought out multiple companies over stuff like this.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Not about infringement as much as getting caught and not being able to sell the watches that were surely expensive to develop.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

If I were an investor I would be much more lenient with the excuse that the market is saturated than the excuse that we're too incompetent to even maintain a presence in the market.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They also have more than enough money to drain Masimo by dragging them through legal proceedings, so Apple can just swoop in and buy them out.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not sure how big Masimo is, but they probably have reasonably deep pockets too considering they manufacture and sell a ton of hospital equipment.

If Apple wanted to buy out Masimo it certainly wouldn't be cheap, and would probably upset their shareholders, but they do have the money

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

What if they wanted to buy them from the start and are thinking they can drop the price?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

If they fold now, what message will it send to other companies that have patents that Apple infringes on?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Maybe the sales figures were less than expected and will use this as an excuse to the board.