this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
13 points (84.2% liked)

UK Politics

6 readers
1 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and either a link to reputable news source, or be a text post.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

We are friends with [email protected], a uk news community on a more general site.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Blame financial blunders and timid regulation, not privatisation

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Trains are different. There isn't market competition between the Train Operating Companies (TOCs) so they created a system of pre-market competition when they privatised them - the competition takes place when TOCs bid against each other in the auction for the local franchises every five (I think?) years.

The bit of the rail network over which it's much harder to introduce competition is the actual railways themselves - which is partly why the railways were renationalised by Labour in 2002.

Water companies don't/can't compete against each other though - that's the reason even the Thatcher government thought it was necessary to give us a system of price cap regulation in order for them to operate privately. But as I've said above, the problem with water isn't monopolistic pricing, it's underinvestment, which wouldn't obviously be solved under public ownership either.