this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
7 points (100.0% liked)
cybersecurity
3598 readers
1 users here now
An umbrella community for all things cybersecurity / infosec. News, research, questions, are all welcome!
Community Rules
- Be kind
- Limit promotional activities
- Non-cybersecurity posts should be redirected to other communities within infosec.pub.
Enjoy!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Your choices are
Both use code from rsyslog, listen on 514 (configurable) and do logging. I think they'll even take mqtt and json-format stuff, but I wasn't needing that yet so I didn't care
Full disclosure: I first started looking into this at my last post, a mere 600 boxes for windows, which I don't do and didn't care about except some log guy was a splunk fanboy dick and I punked him as often as I could because splunk's absolute inability to cope pissed me off and thus he did by association -- thus the mqtt angle as I tried to push that transport idea through because splunk has no clue anymore and can't cope with mqtt and I liked to see his brain reboot. I'm a Linux/Unix guy so I mainly quote on things that will bring the oddballs into line. My new spot has like 3600 winboxes and I just heard that group's choice for shipping logs to the central log correlation is ...
... Nxlog.
Grain of salt, but good luck.
Yeah so rsyslog is one of those premium products. Seems like I can only practically receive without paying for fuckin parsing capabilities (ew)
But I’ll definitely check out the other! Appreciate it!