this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
2134 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

7607 readers
3053 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Same for voting 3rd party, it just ensures you get the candidate you want the least.

this claim is obviously false, since I have provided proof against it. if you want to weaken the claim, moving the goalposts, that's fine, but don't break a sweat.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not sure if you're just being intentionally thick or a troll.

Youre explaining yourself that despite you voting against him, Biden won, and you didn't want Trump and the person you voted for didn't win. So your actions gave you the least chance of having a candidate you were aligned with.

If anything, you are giving proof that it's a dumb thing to do. But that would be anecdotal evidence, and there's no need for that.

If you manually run the results and the effects of 3rd parties, it's pretty clear that it makes no sense in First Past the Post.

It's a thing known as The spoiler effect, or vote splitting and has always been a documented thing that dumb people don't understand. Who do you think funds these 3rd parties in the first place...

Youre being played.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So your actions gave you the least chance of having a candidate you were aligned with.

i was aligned with the candidate for whom i voted, and i was not aligned with the candidates i voted against.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

In 2016, everyone who voted 3rd party got Trump, the candidate they wanted the least.

In 2020, everyone who voted 3rd party was either going to get Biden, (the candidate they are moderately aligned with), or Trump, the candidate they were least aligned with.

In both cases, people who voted 3rd party made their chances worse. If you want more parties, the laws needs to change first, or else you're just wasting your vote and giving it to conservatives, who benefit from your 3rd party vote the most. You may not like it, but you are playing for Conservatives in the political game, and that goes for people who don't vote too.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

you’re just wasting your vote and giving it to conservatives,

no, i'm giving it to leftists.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why bother voting at all? What difference does your non-Democrat, non-Republican vote make? If you really feel the need to be self-righteous about it, save yourself the energy, stay home, and just tell people you voted for Cornel West or whoever. They'll never know otherwise.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

why are you trying to suppress voter turnout?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not trying to suppress anything. It was a question. Again: Why are you expending the energy to vote if you know your candidate won't win?

You haven't answered it. Will you?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

you will forgive me if I don't believe you are "just asking questions". it feels like sealioning to me. and I read the repetition and demand for an answer as petulance.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And I read your refusal to answer such a simple question as proving you can't actually back up your reason for voting at all. But sure, personal attacks might convince everyone that your avoidance of the question is actually proof of your righteousness. Let's see how that goes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it feels like sealioning to me

Personal attack.

and I read the repetition and demand for an answer as petulance.

Personal attack.

Anything else you want to lie about or are you going to answer my question?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How nice of you to share your feelings in the form of personal attacks. Now please answer my question.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

at this point I think it's pretty obvious that you're being petulant.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At this point, I think it's pretty obvious you're hiding your refusal to justify your position behind personal attacks.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

you seem pretty worked up about what a stranger on the Internet thinks. maybe you need a break.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Another personal attack. You just can't justify why you are voting for a candidate who won't win instead of not voting at all. I mean I can easily justify my vote. Ask me to and I will. After you answer my question.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

personal attacks are expressly prohibited in this community and on lemme.world.

if you think that my therapy session friendly language is a personal attack, you should report it. if you think it's that toxic you shouldn't engage with it. a quick flip through my history you will find people literally calling me names. I don't call them out for it I just hit the report button.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

That's nice. Are you going to answer my question?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

2016, everyone who voted 3rd party got Trump

everyone who voted for hilary got trump, too

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

if i'm just too thick to understand, a big big dummy, then you better make sure the vote isn't split: vote with me.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'll vote 3rd party when they legally and statistically have as much chance to win as the others, which doesn't work in First Past The Post.

First they need to change the voting system, then it will be advantageous for me to vote for someone else. Until then my vote is too important to throw away

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'll vote for Democrats when they support my politics.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cool. Keep playing purity politics and let the world go to hell in a handbasket.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

What else is it about then? Trump will enable more genocides not less. Not getting your hands dirty seems to be the motivation I've seen among people who espouse this view point.

But you will get you're hands dirty if you don't vote in the election where fascists are trying to overthrow our democracy.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

My brother in Christ, as far as number of voters are considered, your vote is causing the split. You're in a minority which is enabling GOP by taking away votes from DNC.

Idiot.