this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2024
673 points (100.0% liked)

politics

24025 readers
4871 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Justin Mohn, a 32-year-old Pennsylvania man, is in police custody after allegedly murdering and decapitating his father, claiming the latter was a "federal employee" and a "traitor." Before his arrest, Mohn posted a 14-minute video to YouTube in which he displayed his father's severed head, proclaiming: "This is the head of Mike Mohn, a federal

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's not about republicans, it's about mental health.

Also when mental health problems' reception in the society marginalizes you, you tend to seek for cults\sects and other such kinds of feeling of belonging to something without it being personal (because personal contacts are where your trauma is).

I didn't read the article, but suspect he also lived with his father at that age.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I didn’t read the article

LMAO

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What? Does anything of what I said require reading it? Use your head for a difference

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Participation in a discussion requires your due diligence to at least familiarize yourself with the topic.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Does anything of what I said require reading it?

I think I've addressed that and you are playing dumb.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It’s not about republicans, it’s about mental health.

No, it's about repoublicans. Trump specifically.

Also when mental health problems’ reception in the society marginalizes you, you tend to seek for cults\sects and other such kinds of feeling of belonging to something without it being personal (because personal contacts are where your trauma is).

Wild guess with no backing in the article at all

I didn’t read the article, but suspect he also lived with his father at that age.

Cool guess, but you could also have read the article.

Just shooting wild guesses and opinions under a very problematic topic helps noone and is lazy at best.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you remember when those couple people tortured a developmentally disabled guy on camera because he liked Trump? Probably not.

I don't like Trump but there are definitely crazies everywhere. I think dehumanizing people with different opinions about how to create a healthy society is the dangerous thing. Saying the other side are all monsters tends to turn people with mental illness into monster hunters.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

well, the people you are trying to defend have absolutely no problem at all with dehumanizing you.
Tolerating intolerance leads to more intolerance.
There will always be bad things on both sides. But one of the current sides we are talking about is doing the most harm. Spoiler: its the trumpets.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Wild guess

It's not a guess, it's a dependency connected to the wider subject.

with no backing in the article at all

It's not about the article.

Just shooting wild guesses and opinions under a very problematic topic helps noone and is lazy at best.

My guesses and opinions are definitely better than those of apes throwing their own shit at another bunch of apes with weird red headwear.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Dunno, didn't read your comment

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I wasn't answering the article, you moron. And you were answering my comment.

Why are morons like you always so confident of being able to do irony?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He didn't read it because he can't read, be nice.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Damn, i am sorry. Anal phabets are really bad in life.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s not about republicans, it’s about mental health.

Republicans are actively making it as hard as possible to receive help for or pro actively address mental health issues. They also actively shame people for such problems and want them to just shut up about it. So no, Republicans definitely bear quite a lot of guilt for such "tragedies"!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was answering an opinion about republicans being more likely to cut off heads and spew stuff about immigrants destroying Murrica (because they all are secretly tribesmen with pipe and feathers hidden somewhere safe).

What you say is orthogonal to that.

Yeah, surely they do.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What you say is orthogonal to that.

How so? The primary audience for violent propaganda are republicans. The worst you can find on the democrat/left side are people saying you should beat up Nazis. And even that is hardly done by "official" news channels.

So yeah, currently fanatic republicans are a lot more likely to commit murder than anyone on the other side. Their fetishisation of guns to "defend them self" against the government alone makes sure of that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How so? The primary audience for violent propaganda are republicans. The worst you can find on the democrat/left side are people saying you should beat up Nazis. And even that is hardly done by “official” news channels.

I think we should measure this both in periods when relative dominance is held by Democrats and when it is held by Republicans.

They feel themselves marginalized and act more aggressively.

Their fetishisation of guns to “defend them self” against the government

I actually like that little thing, when it's presented like in Heinlein's books.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think we should measure this both in periods when relative dominance is held by Democrats and when it is held by Republicans.

OK, the same was still true under Trump. Both sides aren't the same.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I haven't said they are the same. But I remember calls for military takeover.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Somewhere about Trump's election.