Fediverse

32256 readers

294 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!

Rules

Posts must be on topic.
Be respectful of others.
Cite the sources used for graphs and other statistics.
Follow the general Lemmy.world rules.

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

What Meta’s Fediverse Plans Mean for Threads Users (www.wired.com)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

67 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Meta is treading carefully, doing a phased implementation while continuing conversations with Fediverse leaders. This will give the company more time to iron out some of the integration kinks. “Do we adapt the protocol to be able to support this?” Lambert asks. “Or do we try to do some kind of interesting, unique implementation?” For example, Threads supports audio posts, a feature not currently supported within ActivityPub, so Meta is experimenting with “federating” a text transcription of the original post instead of the audio version.

It was never a good idea federating with Threads

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

i guess ill say it again. meta hasnt modified the protocol, and the bells and whistles they feed their own users on their own instance means nothing to the rest of the 'verse. calm the fuck down

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

calm the fuck down

What, and miss out on the delicious dopamine that comes from being part of a mob gripped by righteous anger? This is a chance to be mad at the same thing that everyone else is mad at, risk-free.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

you think facebook is announce bad intentions beforehand

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

did you have anything technical to add to the discussion, or just your ephemeral fear?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

do you learn from history

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

if you have something to add, add it. if youre going to go throw more moral arguments against billion dollar companies maybe go bark up a more sympathetic tree. im looking for technical information, not moral indignation.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

am convince that tech bros are beyond help

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Who is fearful? I glanced over this thread and I didn't see a lot of fear; it's mostly just people observing the dishonesty.

Maybe there is or isn't a reason to worry about Facebook coming into the community, but discussing it (at least as I've seen in this thread) doesn't mean either anger or fear. It's just discussing. It's a good thing to do.