this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
1405 points (100.0% liked)

People Twitter

7475 readers
1726 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is false. "Pay for it" or "Pirate it" are not the only 2 options available.

What are the other options then?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not to consume it at all, obviously.

Your measurement for converting potential revenue into loss hinges on those being the only 2 options.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have pointed that out as a possibility. Not consuming it at all, though, is not theft precisely because the person isn't consuming it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In which case piracy only accounts for lost revenue if and only if the pirate would have 100%, guaranteed, purchased the content if a pirates copy was not available. So your calculation does not work.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

if a pirates copy was not available.

This is exactly why my calculation does work. If a pirated copy was not available, they wouldn't be able to consume the media without paying for it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

But they also wouldn't have to pay for it. Which is the only way your calculation would work.