Technology

72990 readers

2861 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

509

Google apologizes for ‘missing the mark’ after Gemini generated racially diverse Nazis (www.theverge.com)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

172 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Google apologizes for ‘missing the mark’ after Gemini generated racially diverse Nazis::Google says it’s aware of historically inaccurate results for its Gemini AI image generator, following criticism that it depicted historically white groups as people of color.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Why would anyone expect "nuance" from a generative AI? It doesn't have nuance, it's not an AGI, it doesn't have EQ or sociological knowledge. This is like that complaint about LLMs being "warlike" when they were quizzed about military scenarios. It's like getting upset that the clunking of your photocopier clashes with the peaceful picture you asked it to copy

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure it's generating racially diverse nazis due to companies tinkering with the prompts under the hood to counterweight biases in the training data. A naive implementation of generative AI wouldn't output black or Asian nazis.

it doesn't have EQ or sociological knowledge.

It sort of does (in a poor way), but they call it bias and tries to dampen it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I don't disagree. The article complained about the lack of nuance in generating responses and I was responding to the ability of LLMs and Generative AI to exhibit that. Your points about bias I agree with

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why shouldn't we expect more and better out of the technologies that we use? Seems like a very reactionary way of looking at the world

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

I DO expect better use from new technologies. I don't expect technologies to do things that they cannot. I'm not saying it's unreasonable to expect better technology I'm saying that expecting human qualities from an LLM is a category error