this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
771 points (100.0% liked)

Comic Strips

17723 readers
1286 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
771
Sealioning (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In the comic replace the word "Sea lion" with any minority and the response is fully appropriate (Other than being in their house).

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why would you do that?

I hate eggs

um actually if you replace eggs with minorities you can see how you're being pretty racist here

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If the comic then had an egg asking "why would you say that?" you'd have a point.

The comic has a sea lion fully capable of speech, and a person saying "I do not like this clearly sentient creature, because they bother me when I say I don't like them as a whole."

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

seems an extremely oversensitive and overly literal take to me. it's just a comedic way to represent a certain type of irritating persona, for the same meaning the character could as well say she dislikes annoying people and be subsequently annoyed by one across the rest of the panels, but that would be less of a comic

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

My point is you could change "Sea lion" to any minority, change the sea lion itself to that minority, and the comic does not lose all meaning. It can be interpreted as someone saying "I do not like (group)" and then being harassed by a member of that group while they repeatedly say nothing but "go away". A racist could read this and think "Damn straight, I should be allowed to say I don't like (race) without being harassed for it!"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Now replace "sea lion" with "pedophile" or "murderer" and the comic remains the same still!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

With "pedophile" or "murderer" the evidence for them having done harm is self evident. In the comic the reasoning for disliking sea lions is not self evident, and the comic could be easily interpreted as "I should be allowed to say I don't like any group I want and not have to defend myself."

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just wanna say thanks for holding the torch here. You pretty much echoed any response I would've made if I'd had the time, but probably better XD Sorry you got the brunt of the hate.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Meh, it's just karma that doesn't even stick your account. Doesn't bother me and provides an alternative point of view.

Personally I don't think the comic did a very good job of demonstrating what "sea lioning" is or why it's a problem. Going by what was presented in the comic this is an example of sea lioning: https://old.reddit.com/r/BoomersBeingFools/comments/1b2egrq/boomer_takes_a_stand_against_crt/

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

OK i think i understand you better, but still it seems a long stretch to me. a racist could read this and etc but so what? if he reads fables and decides that the tortoise represents this minority and the hare is that one his outlandish take does not indicate a problem in the original intention

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But it's not about minorities and not about characteristics that people were born with and can't change (if they wanted to) about themselves.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In the universe presented in the comic: Sea lions are born sea lions, can't change that, and are sentient to the point of having the capacity for language.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I get your previous point about the language, but now you're just actively trying to spin this into something it isn't.

Like, should we really feel bad for cartoon sealions?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

My point isn't we should feel bad for cartoon sea lions, it's that it's not much of a reach for someone to read this and think they are talking about minorities. "Damn right! I should be able to say I don't like (race) without being hassled for it!"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I mean it could very easily be (another internet favourite term) a dogwhistle. It's not actually about sea lions...

I don't think that's the case here but it's easy to see their point