this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2024
239 points (100.0% liked)

Games

37520 readers
1378 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Everyone in the emulation scene can breathe a sigh of relief.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

The primary source for legal precedent is Sony vs Bleem.

I mean, small developers

Just like you told your girlfriend the other night, size doesn't matter

who set up a money-making pateron based on an emulator for a currently sold system,

Bleem was a commercial product to emulate Sony Playstations that came out while the PS1 was still active.

without providing a way to pull your own system info or games from carts (and is therefore heavily reliant on piracy of things currently being sold by the parent company to run)

As long as they aren't giving details on how to rip the games (which, funny enough, would be the dumper) they are in the same grey zone as system BIOSes and the like

is basically screwed, but this isn’t news, and pretty much every other emu dev would run away screaming from such a setup.

There are other nintendo switch emulators. And emulators like RPCS3 very much were active while their target consoles were actively sold.