this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2024
362 points (100.0% liked)
NonCredibleDefense
7614 readers
34 users here now
A community for your defence shitposting needs
Rules
1. Be nice
Do not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.
2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes
If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.
3. Content must be relevant
Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.
4. No racism / hatespeech
No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.
5. No politics
We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.
6. No seriousposting
We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.
7. No classified material
Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.
8. Source artwork
If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.
9. No low-effort posts
No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.
10. Don't get us banned
No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.
11. No misinformation
NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.
Join our Matrix chatroom
Other communities you may be interested in
Banner made by u/Fertility18
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
They knew if they didn't use up the budget they'd lose it for the next year
DoD: "We have a recruitment problem, not an equipment problem. Allocate money properly please?"
Congress: "Where's the profit in that? You can't get kickbacks from the enlisted!"
One of my "favorite" stories of that is CVN-76. Russ Feingold was in Congress in the 90s saying "guys, the Navy doesn't even want this thing, and even in a two theater war, we can get along fine with 5 or 6 supercarriers instead of 12."
It goes ahead anyway. Do you know what they named that monument to fiscal conservatism? The USS Ronald Reagan.
At least they got the shitting itself in public part right.
This is more about a specific office or department within than the agency as a whole.
There was a time when human psychic powers were a legitimate line of scientific inquiry. The ultimate conclusion was "nah, never mind", but the CIA probably got a whiff of the more mainstream research and wanted to know how to weaponize it.
From what we know of Mk Ultra, their "experiments" barely deserve the term. No controls, no good statistical models, and not even a clearly described hypothesis. It's unlikely they figured out anything of value, and probably caused unnecessary human suffering along the way.
Utter garbage article from a pop sci rag. It does the same thing a lot of garbage science does: spends all its time attacking "mainstream science", none of it defending their own positions, and hoping the reader doesn't notice.
And here's the thing: the article focuses its attack on physicalism, but there's nothing necessarily contradictory about physicalism and human psi ability. Some kind of biological radio could very well exist. We simply lack any evidence that it does.