cross-posted from: https://midwest.social/post/9997521
To the person from lemm.ee who reported this post as "terrorism" go fuck yourself.
Link for tickets: https://events2022.tpusa.com/events/kyle-rittenhouse-at-kent-state
Locked because I keep getting reports from people arguing. Cool off.
Too easy.
Ya dumb.
Learn to pronounce mur·der /ˈmərdər/
noun
the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another.
"the stabbing murder of an off-Broadway producer" synonyms: killing, homicide, assassination, liquidation, extermination, execution, slaughter, butchery, massacre, manslaughter, patricide, matricide, parricide, fratricide, sororicide, filicide, infanticide, uxoricide, regicide, slaying
verb
kill (someone) unlawfully and with premeditation.
"somebody tried to murder Joe" synonyms: kill, put/do to death, assassinate, execute, liquidate, eliminate, neutralize, dispatch, butcher, cut to pieces, slaughter, massacre, wipe out, mow down, bump off, do in, do away with, do for, knock off, blow away, blow someone's brains out, stiff, take out, top, croak, give someone the works, dispose of, hit, zap, ice, rub out, smoke, waste, off, whack, scrag, terminate, slay
You'd rather get irate for an hour over something you can Google in 5 seconds.
I may be dumb, but I'm smarter than you.
You're not keeping up. They don't believe it to be lawful so the correct term is murder as you just evidenced yourself.
Ya dumb.
In that case, we're just arbitrarily making up definitions to words and pretending that the whole world accepts our definition as the definition. Which is fucking dumb. Which is why I pointed out that the definition TD was using was not sufficient. Can I call you a murderer because you've responded like a moron, and I hereby define that as the definition for murder? Hello? 911? We have a murderer on the loose, come lock them up?
Of course not. It's a fucking stupid argument. Either words have meaning, or they don't. If you want to call Kyle a killer thats fair. He definitely killed someone, but it falls way short of murder. Even if it was unlawful, it still doesn't meet the test for murder, probably manslaughter instead (the crime of killing a human being without malice aforethought, or otherwise in circumstances not amounting to murder). Or, words don't have meaning. Therefore, "distant your flexible you volume". It probably means something nice.
I didn't define either word, you did. Don't blame me because you're not smart enough to see a trap bud.
What did I blame you for? What word did I accuse you of defining? What trap did I fall for?
Nothing, never said you did I think you should probably check username though.
Look at your last three comments to me and answer that one yourself, it's quite obvious and if you can't remember something you said less than a day ago I won't hold my breath for this conversation anyway.
The one you clearly still don't see.
Are you sure you arent @madison420
This isn't you, in literally your previous reply to me ~3 hrs ago?
Because that is you, saying that I blamed you for something (still not sure what though, please reference). That is you, saying that I fell for a trap (which is not apparent, so please explain). So yeah. I'm pretty sure I know that I have at least 3 different conversations going on here that have fragmented off at different points. Are you having an identity issue? Maybe problems keeping your accounts straight?
I am me, correct. Seems obvious but you do you.
Reading comprehension, get some.
Please, point out specifically where my reading comprehension was lacking? Is asking for specific examples with quotes too much?
Also still missing is the "trap" that I fell in to, and the "thing" that I blamed you for. Go ahead and quote those, otherwise I'll take Hitchen's Razor to those claims.
Try the last several of your comments, I already said that so add that comment as well.
I didn't miss anything, it's very obvious. Need I point out the color of the sky for you as well or at some point are you going to take responsibility for saying stupid trolly shit?
Right, so at this point, you have made assertions without evidence, and when asked to simply reference the evidence, you have failed make even the simplest defense of your claims.
Therefore, your points regarding my reading ability, blaming you for something, and that I fell into a "trap" by you can be refuted with the same evidentiary threshold.
If you'd like to continue this discussion, please provide direct evidence that:
I have blamed you for something
I have fallen for a trap
there is a lack of reading comprehension on my part.
Further discussion without meeting these (very basic) requirements is a tacit admission that any and all of those claims are without merit, and you yourself are trolling and not providing honest discourse.
The ball is in your court.
My evidence is the definitions you've provided dumb dumb, that's the trap.
Again reading comprehension basil exposition, using more words doesn't actually mean you're saying anything of value.
This is a tacit admission from @madison420 that their previous statements are unfounded and meaningless.
There's that reading comprehension thing again.
It's all there, just read the big words and use that smooth fuckin brain for something other then word vomit.
Another baseless accusation, adding further evidence that @Madison420 is not engaging in good-faith discussion, and tacitly acknowledges that their previous statements are meaningless, because they have been unable to point out any actual shortcomings in my reading comprehension.
Amusing. Good luck on your lazy trolling endeavors. At least put in enough effort to keep up with the conversation.
You're the one who is at least 4 posts behind, because as of this message, you, @Madison420, have yet to provide any proof for your claims. Without that supporting information, any further communication further emphasizes my position that your claims are empty and without substance. Feel free to quote any point in our conversation that supports your claim, in order to refute my assertation. You could have done it many messages/hours ago, yet here we are.
Your claims are an empty and worthless, and your refusal to converse in good faith or admit your error is a reflection of your character.
Sure, don't let reality intervene, you certainly haven't yet.
Another post, another missed opportunity to make me eat crow. We both know you can't actually do it, because what you think happened didn't really happen, which is why you can't actually find it, quote it, and shove it back in my face.
So, they usual again? @Madison420 has (again) failed to provide the slightest shred of actual evidence to support their claims against me. This paints their person in a most unfavorable light.
Let me make a prediction. In their next post here, they still won't even make an attempt to correct this.
Every post you make in which you still haven't seen the trap and the evidence you're crying about is very much you eating crow and an absolute delight for me sir, carry on.
A trap that doesn't exist, which is why you can't point to it and say "that was the trap and here you are falling for it".
The person making the claim has the responsibility to provide proof. It's not crying if you are bring asked to back up your baseless claims, it's basic logic.
Doesn't seem that way to me. Seems more like I'm eating your lunch, rather than taking the empty bullshit you keep trying to serve.
I won't kink shame. Some people really like getting whipped a bit.
Sure, I guess?
Wow, look at that! My prediction came true, @Madison420 still hasn't provided any evidence for their claims, and therefore they can be refuted without any evidence. Your empty replies resonate loudly in the echo chamber of your integrity.
No need more words when fewer do trick.
Simply spouting shit doesn't mean you're actually saying anything and at this point it's fairly certain you're a shitty bot, but please do go on.
Ah, more baseless accusations and a new personal attack. Feel free to meet the very low bar of simply scrolling up, copying what I said that proves your claims about me, and then scrolling back down, pasting it, and pressing next. You don't even have to format it or anything. You won't, because you can't, because you're wrong, because I am not what you accuse me of being. Nut up or shut up.
Oh, for the record again, this is yet another empty statement from @Madison420 to throw on the pile. Feel free to make some effort to defend yourself at any time here.
You should take your own advice and scroll up like I suggested before crybaby.
Scrolled up, scrolled down. The claims you made are still unfounded in reality.
Please, reference real information to support your claim, otherwise, kindly fuck off.