this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
432 points (100.0% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

38841 readers
156 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Edit: see comments for clarifications.

I am probably late on this one, but god damn this is one nasty trick by Philips.

Context; I recently decided to upgrade my shaver, from a Philips One Blade to Philips an all-in-one-trimmer-7000. As you can see on the pictures below, they changed the charger for the adapter by maybe 1–2 millimetres, just so the old charger could not be used by the old charger. Now, this normally isn't a big deal, but with the new trimmer, the charger is USB-A only. Where's the previous one had the plug on it instead. To me this is mildly infuriating as I know need to get an extra adapter just to charge my shaver in the bathroom. They had the exact same design for the chargers, yet changed it just slightly so they wouldn't be able to be reused? Why... Philips... why?

Edit: many good points in the comments! I don't know how to manually check the voltage, but seems like folks figured it out in the comments too. Should have just been USB-C!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 263 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

Having experience with electromechanics - I have seen times where this was done on purpose to make sure that people aren't trying to reuse an incompatible plug for charging purposes. NiCd doesn't charge the same as LiFePo, Li-ion, etc. Charging voltages, polarities, stability of power output, etc.

To be fair though, they just need to make everything USB-C anyhow. Especially shavers.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I bought this one from Conair because it is rechargeable with USB-C.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I like it, the different clip lengths are holding on quite well, and I do like the adjustable ones when trimming my beard.

It's also relatively quiet.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I keep buying these oneblades over and over. I’m tempted by 🧲 and steel blades

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

My next shaver will be USB-C. It's now a standard for charging whatever you want.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

I know a lot of RC brands did this too. They didn't want people blowing up their Li-On batteries with old chargers, or getting complaints because it takes three days to charge.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To be fair though, they just need to make everything USB-C anyhow.

Careful what you wish for. Putting advanced electronics into very simple devices will just make them fail a lot faster.
Some old device just needed 12V over a barrel jack to run some motor or light and charge the battery and it lasted a decade - only failed because the battery got old. New one now needs a state of the art power delivery chip to negotiate the right voltage and current, and all over a very fine pitch connector that will fail if you look at it wrong. Not looking good on the durability front at all.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you Apple engieneer? Because I have no idea why PD chip is state of art for you

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't work for Apple, but I am an electronics engineer. Just don't be surprised when your simpler devices start failing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

The only issue I have with USB power solutions is that it's also capable of data transfer, which is bad. Imagine a dystopian future of being tracked by companies and governments by the places you plugged your shaver in at, of all the stupid things that could happen.

If the only thing keeping a battery from exploding or corroding is a 4cm^3 box with a prong on one side and hole on the other then the people making the devices just need to incorporate power regulators into their designs.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

It's capable of data transfer...but to a power brick in the wall? Are there people who plug their shavers into their PC?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean... If it has a USB socket and I can plug it into my PC... Surely it was intended for that. After all the USB ports on a PC are just as capable of delivering power.

Sure may be an unusual solution to charge a shaver but you could do that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Exactly. It's going to be the most uncommon thing though. Convenient in an emergency if somehow you have a spare PC for charging and not a USB-C power brick...somehow...

But there's not enough people doing it to justify what this guy is suggesting.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It's also completely unnecessary since there are better devices for tracking and shenanigans available. Why bother with a shaver that has neither a camera or a microphone or is tracking location for anything when you can use a device that has all of that. Like pretty much every modern phone on the market, more so smartphones.

Regarding that other thing... In practice it could be that you are staying in a hotel room for any reason really but you forgot your power brick, still need to shave, but have a PC for one reason or another and a spare cable to use. However unlikely that is, but it's not unheard of to forget the phone charger when going on a trip.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you going to remove outlets and strip walls every hotel you ever visit to check for data? Because that somehow sounds both sane and also unhinged, good luck with that.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Why would I need to? 110v outlets aren't regularly equipped with Data transfer capability. And last I checked, there weren't any USB-C -> 110v data transfer dongles available...highly doubt a hotel is gonna retrofit them for collecting your shaving habits.

Because that somehow sounds both sane and also unhinged, good luck with that.

You're projecting a bit much.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your ignorance of the potential for harm due to it's unlikelihood makes me think electrical engineering might be the wrong discipline for you.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think you may have a horrible misunderstanding about how the real world works. As well as the specifics of USB-PD, and other such things; like paranoia, and schizophrenia.

Nothing you just said has any basis in reality or reasonability. Most people charge devices off of USB-PD power bricks, which are not going to be converted to transfer data across 110v lines for the purposes of collecting the data from your shaver. The amount of infrastructure and added cost that would bring is absolutely moronic at scale, and much more easily done through wifi or bluetooth, without even bothering with data-over-power.

Amazon has the "Sidewalk" network, and you wouldn't even need to do anything fancy other than put a $2 ESP32 or NRF into the shaver to communicate and transmit data...forget trying to hijack it over USB...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So you flat out do not believe that USBs have data capabilities as a blanket statement?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bro usb has data transfer capabilities. But if you connect to a power brick, which basically converts AC to lower volt DC and delivet power. It might be a problem only if you directly connect usb to wall withouth the power brick

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah my apologies, when you said "power brick" you meant a converter for a wall outlet. That term isn't standard in my region so I assumed you meant an outlet with USB capability, which is what I was discussing. They're actually becoming very common, so I was expressing my distrust in making them a new standard.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I was not the original commentor btw

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Powerline communication is a thing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You're right, it totally is. Almost nobody uses it. For good reason; it's prone to noise, slow speeds, circuit division, and licensing costs. It's an argument of practicality here...it's not practical, it's not profitable, so it's not gonna happen.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Making communication over barrel jack is not hard either.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm discussing how it connects to the wall. You would be the second person to somehow misconstrue that. Wall outlets should not become USB.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't understand you. Barrel jack is not usb.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was never at any point talking about barreljack or any other intermediary power supply adapters for the devices. You are the one talking about that. Go talk to somebody else about it. I am talking about the potential of USB becoming so commonplace as a means of power supply that wall outlets start using it as a standard, which would be bad.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was never at any point talking about barreljack or any other intermediary power supply adapters for the devices.

Correct, you was talking about how it is scary for you that USB can be used not only to charge device, but also to transfer data. To which I replied even barrel jack can be used for transfering data.

Even more: you can use USB PD 2.0(but not 3.1, at least not out of box) over barrel jack.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I've never seen a barreljack wall port so I fail to see any relevance. If it exists then I guess I'm against that, too.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

We should all use public chargers. I heard they're safe

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the bluetooth/wifi functionality on most modern electronics is much more worrisome than that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

There can be many problematic things independent of each other.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, shavers should not use USB C. Because in developed countries you cannot have USB in the bathroom. We have special shaver sockets and they're not USB compatible.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then you should refine your laws. Because my shavers all use USB C; and the EU has mandated USBC in specific products, and it wouldn't be a bad idea to expand that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

and the EU

Yeah, I live in Europe, lol. Sockets in bathrooms are very specific here.