this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2023
-1 points (0.0% liked)

United Kingdom

12 readers
1 users here now

Main community for the Feddit UK instance

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Contains racial slurs which are a realistic portrayal of how people would talk at the time it is set, but which are difficult for the students to hear repeated in a classroom setting, regardless of context

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Theres only so much you can coddle students though, before its just a bit silly

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'd agree with that. It's probably a positive thing for children to be exposed to that sort of language in a controlled environment where the teacher can explain historical context. It's not like they'll be avoid racial slurs forever

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Are you talking about white kids, or black kids though? I think the issue is that black kids unfortunately will hear that language anyway, as the targets of it, and that hearing it read out in the classroom is going to be a very different experience for them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

If they also studied a book that contained racist terms for white people, then it would be fair in that context.

However are there any racial slurs for white people that are as offensive as it is for black people? I don’t honestly think so.

Societies moving on, time to drop off mice and men from the syllabus and educate as to why it was removed in a different classroom setting.