this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2024
314 points (100.0% liked)

World News

46162 readers
2405 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive Link

In a recent appearance on Russia's state-run television, Russian political scientist Sergey Mikheyev suggested that the country's "empire" should grow to encompass three American states.

"I want the Russian empire with Alaska, Hawaii, California, Finland, and Poland," he said, as translated by Gerashchenko for the clip he shared. "Although Poland and Finland are so stinky, I'm not sure, to be honest. We'll clean them."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 83 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Lets say Russia magically is able to land on US soil completely intact after passing through the US Navy infested waters of the Atlantic or the Pacific. Lets just assume they can so we can continue this crazy thought experiment.

To take territory you need boots on the ground, troops, tanks, APCs, etc. These are transported by troop transport aircraft and large ships that are naval landing craft. For Russia that would be the Ropucha-class. Each of these ships can carry about 10 tanks and about 310 troops (per ship).

So how many of these ship does Russia have? Hundreds, right? Nope: 11. Thats it. So assuming a full load of every ship thats about 110 tanks and about 3500ish troops. And all of that assumes all 11 ships will make it alive to US soil.

This is just how crazy this Russian claim of taking US States is.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 51 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's not supposed to make sense, it's supposed to make actual Kremlin policy seem sane and moderate to the domestic audience.

[–] morphballganon@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They wouldn't need magic. They'd just need a hamburder puppet President in office.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

*hamberder. You give him too much credit.

[–] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 8 points 1 year ago (7 children)

You forget that Alaska is like 2 miles from Russia

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I think you forget that we have 24 hour satellite surveillance all over the globe.

If you think Russia could send a large fraction of its blue water navy to one single point on the globe while also mustering all those troops and equipment on the ground in Russia beforehand without the US knowing about it weeks before hand, you don't have a good grasp on the level of technology employed in today's military.

[–] not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He's talking about California. He understands taking Alaska and Hawaii, but cali?

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Hmm, Pearl Harbor and the place where the 10th mountain train to fight in snow.

Ok Ivan, good luck. You’re gonna need it.

Bruh there's so many gun nuts in Alaska that jerk off to Red Dawn it'll be Winter War 2: Now With Air Support

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Also its alaska. Russia would be operating out of what, vladivastok maybe to take similarly shitty US ports in alaska.

If russia wants shitty coastal wilderness at uninhabitable climates they already have them.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah, but we have Sarah Palin there to take care of it for us.

[–] carbrewr84@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Where is Russia 2 miles from Alaska? It's about 50ish miles. Last I checked, it's also not a great place to start a ground invasion. The US could blow the shit out of that area of Alaska and nothing much would be missed.

[–] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 1 points 1 year ago

Is it that far? You can see Russia from alaska

[–] BeautifulMind@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Where is Russia 2 miles from Alaska?

The international border goes between the islands of little and big Diomede. Both of these islands are remote from land in either direction, and they are situated about midway in the narrowest part of the Bering Strait.

Since you asked where, here it is on a map

Yep, that's pretty close, but nope, that's not really tactically meaningful.

[–] Squiddly@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not to mention every other citizen is armed

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] irreticent@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not even a little bit? Okay...

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If civilian gun ownership was enough to stop a military then the US would never have gotten a standing military. Like what the 2nd amendment was intended for

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Well…once they consolidate their claim of Canada it will be easier

NAVY stands for Never Again Volunteer Yourself.

And after basic training and almost dying because of medical stuff unrelated to military service forced me out of the military, I took that to heart. Especially given who won the election in the years following my enlistment. No way was I going back. I'm still adamant to never reenlist, and I will always tell others NOT to enlist in the current US military unless major systemic changes are made so you don't have to think to yourself "are we the baddies?" when in your bunk. I will happily tell anyone a recruiter is talking to about my experience, my family's general military experience, and that with current volatility even if you agree with what they're doing today, your enlistment will last longer than one administration and tomorrow you could be bombing Gaza and Ukraine right alongside other fascists.

All that said, If a foreign country invaded the us, you bet your ass I would be joining up with my ex-military friends for some good old fashioned minutemen militia. I've seen their equipment and what Russia is using in Ukraine. Russians would fail against well armed civilians (the ones who also have training, not just money).

The biggest flaw with Red Dawn isn't that guerilla style combat tactics from teenagers and random adults could repel an enemy invasion coughvietnamcough, it's that the enemy forces would never have made it to the mainland in such force in the first place.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

after passing through the US Navy infested waters of the Atlantic or the Pacific.

It's something about 4 kilometers from Russia to US. Or 86 km between mainlands.

[–] deafboy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

No. First you make the inhabitants ask russia for brotherly help. Invitation > invasion.