Science Memes

14730 readers

480 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
Keep it rooted (on topic).
No spam.
Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

[email protected]

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

868

fossil fuels (mander.xyz)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

86 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I mean I feel like 90% of that would require inventing a way to achieve trans oceanic shipping without the use of fossil fuels, and the answers to that have basically been ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think they did that in the time of Columbus

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah just build a wooden frigate that can handle 100 megatons of containers, simple.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I've seen legitimate proposals for basically just raising tower sails on a cargo vessel, and I always am flabbergasted that these people never seem to consider that super tall sails can cause the boat to capsize.

Torque increases the further you get from the center of rotation, and windspeeds pick up damn quick when you start building upwards.

If you wanted to protect the ship from a capsize you'd need to make it into something like a Polynesian style double hull to act as a buoyant force against the wind trying to push the boat over, and voila, now you've made a bunch of major canals unnavigable to your ship.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I mean I could see there might be clever optimizations, ways to handle wind power or even some kind of tidal/wave harnessing. But it definitely won't be the way Columbus did it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I honestly don't think we need to settle on trans oceanic shipping as a hard requirement.

Also, in terms of transportation-based emissions, personal vehicle usage accounted for 58% of the total emissions in the US in 2019. This number doesn't need to exist. The fossil fuel industry has structured cities the way they are and lobbied against efficient transportation in order to make themselves more money.

Like even if we're accepting trans oceanic freight as a given, which I don't think we should on the scale we do now, emissions could be drastically reduced mostly by better planning of transportation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

58% of a total that doesn't include the emissions outsourced to manufacturing companies in the third world.