this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2024
690 points (100.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

34486 readers
746 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Everytime I look at small problems or big global problems, if you follow the money trail, it all leads to some billionaire who is either working towards increasing their wealth or protecting their wealth from decreasing.

Everything from politics, climate change, workers rights, democratic government, technology, land rights, human rights can all be rendered down to people fighting another group of people who defend the rights of a billionaire to keep their wealth or to expand their control.

If humanity got rid of or outlawed the notion of any one individual owning far too much money than they could ever possibly spend in a lifetime, we could free up so much wealth and energy to do other things like save ourselves from climate change.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

In the US we used to have a very high tax rate for those who were extremely wealthy, Distributing the excess back to the government/citizenry. We need the return back to that.

The citizenry need to ask for that, as well as for ranked-choice voting.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

but the post is right, billionaires got the law changed to benefit themselves...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As far as voting is concerned everyone who is eligible to vote should get one vote. It is a terrible idea to do anything other than that.

As far as taxes go, we should simply encourage people who are wealthy to fund charities. Also the tax rate is already pretty high. Maybe we just need to increase the number of rungs on the scale. I don't think millionaires or billionaires have anything against taxes or at least nothing compared to the rest of us.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You should look into ranked voting. You still only get one vote, just if your preferred candidate is eliminated you can propose your second/third choice as well. This allows you to vote with your morals but also strategically.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This isn’t correct

You get 1 vote but you’re giving points to the 1st/2nd/3rd option

Most people differ on first option so someone politically between the two usually gets to win

The hopeful outcome is that you get candidates further left or right than what is presently available even though they wouldn’t win

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That just sounds like a over complicated solution to a problem that doesn't exist

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The problem exists, but I do wonder if the average voter can understand it. We have a lot of difficulty getting average people to understand basic concepts.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

One party system?

"Oh wow so undemocratic holy shit you psycho how dare you even suggest a thing?"

Two party system?

"Oh woooow so much democracy everyone gets to choose between two options. Perfection achieved. Aliens cross the galaxy to study our high advanced flaeless two party system in a desperate hope to emulate it"

More then two parties?

"No way there should be more options, that's just crazy you psycho how dare you suggest this to me just shut the fuck up and vote for the blue conservatives."

I hope some day you think outside the box. More like a prison then a box really...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What is a "blue conservative"

If your so far extreme that you see everyone as the enemy then I am worried