this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
1081 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

7873 readers
2895 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

"Choices have consequences" is not something that should be said in regards to a government coercing you about a matter of your rights.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Nobody is coercing you to do anything when your employer doesn't want people spreading disease in their company. Nobody is coercing anyone if e.g. hospitals refuse to hire someone who hasn't had certain vaccinations. It has nothing to do with coercion. It has to do with the fact that actions and choices have consequences. You don't get to willingly disregard (the safety of) everyone else and expect to be welcome everywhere.

If I choose not to shower, and stink to high heaven, some employers won't hire me. If I choose not to wear shoes, or walk around in my underwear, I will be denied access to many places. Does this mean I am being coerced to shower and wear clothes?

Actions have consequences. It's just that simple. You can always choose to not do x, but when it's a requirement for y, you won't get to do y unless you do x. And speaking of rights, what about everyone else's rights to not have to sit/work/eat/wait next to Typhoid Mary? Or is it really your opinion that whatever someone does, their right to do whatever is more important than the rest of society? Do you think businesses should be forced to allow anyone inside no matter what? Employers are not allowed to set requirements for their employees?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Long answer to a different point, don't care, try responding to what I actually said.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's the exact same point. You disingenuously calling it "government coercion" doesn't change anything.

But thank you for pointing out you don't actually care. Means I don't have to waste more time on this. I wish you a pleasant day.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Oh ok (fucking retard) you're right

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Dude that's so rude and doesn't net you any points in your argument. Gotta respect people.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

No....no I don't.