this post was submitted on 20 May 2024
507 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

8475 readers
3137 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok for sure the ivermectin thing wasn't smart. But it was the only alternative to the vaccine being talked about at the time.

It was not. It was a flight of utter fancy. It was a fiction.

While that was a mistake, he does have a good point about pharmaceutical companies pushing out the COVID vaccines very quickly and making as killing in profits.

He does not. No one got rich off of the COVID-19 vaccines. In fact, vaccines in general are not a cash cow for the pharmaceutical industry. I'm not saying the industry is populated by good people—lol nope—but if you follow the money it doesn't go far because there isn't much of it. They get the good PR from selling vaccines, and then they make money from ED pills and such.

Many people have reported serious permanent side effect to those vaccines.

No they haven't. And don't try to toss VAERS data at me; it'll just prove that you don't know what that database is. In reality the side effects from the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are almost miraculously low—somewhat lower than the industry standard in terms of occurrences, and much lower than the industry standard in terms of severity. Most importantly, though, they were dramatically lower than just catching the disease.

Maybe there should've been a bit more quality assurance or more tests to ensure there wouldn't be any problems.

mRNA vaccines have been in development since 1993. The pharmaceutical industry wasn't pushing it because traditional vaccines were good enough (read: cheaper) between 1993-2020, but the R&D was consistent for that time.

Then again, it was in a period where the vaccine was absolutely necessary and as soon as possible. So... Yeah. We didn't really have a choice.

We definitely did need the speed of mRNA in vitro transcription vaccines at the height of the pandemic. But it's not like this was a "second-best" option, or a case where we were settling for something.

I implore you, get your medical information from reliable sources.