790
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

5 to freaking 10???

Above bass rate metabolism, yes. They didn't adjust the data for that and you didn't bother to consider what was being said to you.

I hit the gym regularly, pal! Even then, me going or not has no bearing on this. Youre just being silly now.

Compared to controls without exercise, aerobic training was consistently found to be effective on weight loss, which was not the case for resistance training.7

This is just hilarious. If you look at reference 7, what they're quoting, you'll see its about stopping muscle atrophy in people in people on calorie reduced diets. They used resistance training to keep the weight up, via stopping muscle atrophy.

And, again, you choose to ignore the bits you don't like:

...Although the effect on weight and fat loss is of relatively small magnitude.

Like I said, its little to no effect. Its just BS pushed by food lobby groups and people who don't understand bio chem.

this post was submitted on 27 May 2024
790 points (100.0% liked)

Greentext

6802 readers
665 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS