this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2024
404 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

68441 readers
2590 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It's in a foreign language called unnecessary gatekeeping

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's just in European. it's an entirely reasonable assumption that people in this continent with even a passing interest in the world will know what an NGO is (that's not even European-specific) as well as what the GDPR is. Your argument suggests that people from the US, for instance, should be forbidden from talking about IRAs and the IRS and their 401(k)s and the DMV because those terms mean very little to nothing over here.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

No, actually, nothing I said implies that at all. It's standard for authors in all fields to define their acronyms. And yes, I absolutely expect American authors to define their terms. The fact that we am American I don't notice that irs is undefined in a given article doesn't mean that's permissible.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

💀 noyb is the name of an organization and GDPR is a law. NGO is the only thing you could even remotely begin to describe as unnecessary jargon but that's still a stretch.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Seems so simple they could have done the same in the article, so thank you for reinforcing my point.