this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2024
807 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

72764 readers
1355 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Moritz Körner, Member of the European Parliament, disclosed the decision on Twitter. Swedish publisher SVG said, “The question was removed at the last moment from Thursday’s ambassadorial meeting in Brussels”.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 96 points 1 year ago (3 children)

They will keep trying again and again and again. The assault on privacy has been going on for decades and it will never stop.

[–] [email protected] 71 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You've gotta defend for an infinite amount of time, but they've only gotta succeed once.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yep, and as I pointed out in another comment in this thread, Chat Control isn't the only piece of legislation like this that's in the works.

Considering that the extreme right just won big, I have no doubt that one of these fascist surveillance packages will go through. Yeah, at first it may be used for catching criminals, until it isn't

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nono, it will always only be used to catch criminals, that won't change...it's what makes someone a criminal that changes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ha, fuckin' touché

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Actually it was the Left wing that mainly voted yes for this. Just saying.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Source? In Germany at least that's not the case, it's mainly the conservatives who push for it. In the original vote, only the greens clearly opposed it. Later on, SPD (center-left) and FDP (liberal) changed course to also oppose it. Couldn't find results for other countries though, so I'm genuinely curious.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I did found: https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/posts/chat-control/ All the red countries where in favor actually. Yellow were in research. Green is opposed.

here is the document itself: https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-11316-2024-INIT/fr/pdf#page=4

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Doesn't change who's in charge now

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I believe all parties in EU are not really understanding technology in general. So I think it's a very bad decision to give these people power over these kinds of rules. They just have no idea what they are doing frankly.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yep, no disagreement there. This sort of mass surveillance is a fucking terrible idea no matter who's behind the wheel

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

exactly, they these people are constantly trying to come up mass surveillance, over and over and over again. Never ending story.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I believe all parties in EU are not really understanding technology in general.

There are pirates. Well, after last elections it seems to be the pirate. Only one.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Considering that the extreme right just won big

Someone won big yachts from Putin.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Yes. Technically, a similar vote could repeal the law just as easily but there is a history of governments not giving their power away easily; implementing it also sets a precedent and creates technical enforcement options for other governments willing to go through with something similar in the future, or for hackers to exploit because gov-rooted devices will remain in operation for years after the potential repeal.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

And "Chat Control" isn't even the only thing like this in the pipeline. There's the so-called "security by design" bullshit (which does the opposite of what then name implies) that's actually even worse than Chat Control and has also been worked on in secret, and which'd include mass scale surveillance of not just photos but pretty much everything, and is much more likely to pass than Chat Control.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

2001 especially.