this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024
348 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22294 readers
6403 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 41 points 8 months ago (1 children)

To say there WAS a primary is a lie, the other credible candidates were forced out. Claiming that a coronation is a primary is how you lose voters.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Which candidate(s) were forced out?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Anyone? Or are we just going to downvote anyone asking for evidence that there "was no primary" when there very clearly was one.

It'd be perfectly reasonable to say something has changed and we need to reassess Biden as the candidate. You're not doing that, you're lying about the process to try and get people mad because you think that will motivate them. There was a primary. No one serious ran against Joe Biden. This was not just a Biden/DNC decision. All those better candidates people are suggesting also made the same exact calculation.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I mean, I've answered this so many times that I'm copy-pasting at this point, but the answer is Dean Phillips. He was the only real Democrat challenging Biden, he was kept off the ballot in half the states, and he was run out of the party for challenging the incumbent. They forced him to step down from leadership, they got someone to primary him for his house seat, and he's not running for reelection. He even encouraged other members of Congress to join him in running so their could be a real primary, but no one else was brave enough to do it, and for good cause; he was literally forced out of Congress for challenging Biden.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

He was the only real Democrat challenging Biden, he was kept off the ballot in half the states

And in the states where he qualified and was in the ballot? How badly did he beat Biden?

He even encouraged other members of Congress to join him in running so their could be a real primary, but no one else was brave enough to do it,

This is what I'm getting at. Alllllll those other better candidates made the CHOICE not to oppose Biden. They weren't prevented from doing so, they just came to a different conclusion than you did. No one stopped Gretchen Witmer from getting ballot access and running a primary campaign. No one stopped Josh Shapiro from running a primary campaign. Hell Biden wasn't even on the ballot in NH and he still beat Phillips. There is no serious candidate who wanted a shot and wasn't given one. They all had a shot, and they all said "not this time".

he was literally forced out of Congress for challenging Biden.

Gonna need a source on this one. He stepped down from leadership because he didn't agree with the rest of the caucus on issues. I've seen absolutely nothing claiming he's not running for reelection because the party forced him out. Are there any votes, statements, etc you could point to here?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

His presidential campaign manager, Jeff Weaver, did an interview on The Lever where he talked about how the DNC controls the primaries to protect the incumbent President, and he goes into more detail on the rat-fucking they gave Phillips. It aired on July 1st, and it should be available on whatever your preferred podcast platform is. This is twice now that you've made me answer things you could have learned on your own, so I'm gonna ask you to be responsible for your own ignorance going forward.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This is twice now that you've made me answer things you could have learned on your own, so I'm gonna ask you to be responsible for your own ignorance going forward.

I asked for a source to a claim YOU made. It's not my job to make your arguments for you. Maybe be prepared to back up your claims and not be an asshole about it? I'm going to watch the interview, and if there's a case to be made I'm more than happy to reevaluate what I've said.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You also demanded to know which candidates were forced out, left a snitty reply when you didn't get an answer, then gave combative answers to the only two people who did bother to answer you. The retaliatory nature of the DNC isn't exactly a secret, nor is the control they try to exert over the primary process, so you could find information on this yourself. I have to assume you either haven't done any research or just don't want to know.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

You know what, that's fair. I was being a bit of an asshole and I apologize. I'm listening to that Sirota/Weaver interview now, thanks for the recommendation.

We still disagree but I don't think we're enemies so there's no point in attacking each other. I'll let you know my thoughts when I finish the podcast.

I have to assume you either haven't done any research or just don't want to know.

I honestly looked for statements from Phillips and Williamson prior to you linking that interview. I did not think to look for his campaign manager, Phillips has been relatively quiet.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Fair enough, sorry if I was a prick too.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah no one would commit political suicide to run against the incumbent unless they had been obviously out of it as Biden appears to be going. So yes it was a DNC decision as they would go after those who tried to run.

And even with it being an uncontested primary the administration still attacked those doing protest votes in it over their handling of Palestinians.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Yeah no one would commit political suicide to run against the incumbent unless they had been obviously out of it as Biden appears to be going. So yes it was a DNC decision as they would go after those who tried to run.

Yeah, that's how it works. You have to BEAT the incumbent. That's literally what primaries are for. No one beat him, and the ones who tried failed.