this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2024
913 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

71761 readers
3980 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

C and e don’t sound like bad things

At least not bad enough for the company not to do it

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

All of it is a reason for people to vote not to allow it. This can be accomplished federally or via initiatives in states. If a handful states comprising 30-50% of the pop wont allow it then it will be dead.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Seems like forcing liability would be more successful

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

More successful or more beneficial?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Forcing the company to be liable for the data they collect would be more likely to stop them from doing it than trying to outlaw them collecting it

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No it wouldn't because poor people can trivially be kept out of court all kinds of ways from binding arbitration to half assed enforcement. As a rule if you want someone to NOT do something you have to tell them they can't do it!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No it wouldn’t because elected officials don’t represent poor people

But we’re talking about buying new BMWs anyway. Your logic was just too stupid to not laugh at

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The problem is there is no reason to suspect that a lucrative strategy doesn't spread to other manufacturers and indeed segments.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And it will be long established before it effects the poor

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

So your previous argument was nonsense